Epstein Secrets

FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel forM., E.W. and Jane Doe 5 EFTA00808425

ealing with an expert which is otherwise qualified to testify to what he's going to testify. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 93:16-20.) Indeed, "[a]s indicated in Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981), the exclusion of an unlisted witness' testimony is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only

84112-0730 Limited Intervenor a -Counsel for E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associate

EARING After ruling that Epstein would not be allowed to use certain exhibits identified since March 2018 on his Clerk's Trial Exhibit List under a Binger' analysis, this Court raised the pending issue of the 47 e-mails that Edwards claims are privileged and Epstein's pending request for an in camera

as completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Sh

hibit 3.) During its in camera review, this Court must consider and determine: 1. The e-mails are directly relevant to the issues for trial and no Binger's "surprise in fact" exists regarding them; 2. If any work product protection existed, it was waived or excepted based on: a. Farmer Jaffe's exp

ah.edu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associate

EARING After ruling that Epstein would not be allowed to use certain exhibits identified since March 2018 on his Clerk's Trial Exhibit List under a Binger' analysis, this Court raised the pending issue of the 47 e-mails that Edwards claims are privileged and Epstein's pending request for an in camera

came on for hearing before the Honorable Donald W. Hafele, Presiding Judge, at the Palm Beach Count

tion -- THE COURT: That's what I'm doing today until the noon hour. MR. LINK: Great. Thank you, Your Honor. MR. SCAROLA: And there is a threshold Binger issue, which my presentation addresses that I provided to opposing counsel but have not yet given to Your Honor. I can give it to Your Honor now,