Epstein Secrets

FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel forM., E.W. and Jane Doe 5 EFTA00808425

expert which is otherwise qualified to testify to what he's going to testify. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 93:16-20.) Indeed, "[a]s indicated in Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981), the exclusion of an unlisted witness' testimony is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the most compelling

84112-0730 Limited Intervenor a -Counsel for E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associate

l by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and will continue to be under seal, and will be filed under seal in case of Ringer v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). 2 EFTA00808705 a need for appellate review. So that is going to be the direction of the Court, that the motion be

ak itteieeCe51-rtikl i-5 a off, to% IiIiviiii-W.:EPSIP-Wis_si4) -A b; 7fev fAmiae-__EP5-4-F-etha

s so disgusting it's like a prison in a third-world country. Cleaning supplies are not issued on a regular basis." The individual further advised, "Pest Control is horrible and ineffective, rats, mice and bugs are everywhere." Another Correctional Officer told me, "There are mice and bugs everywhere includi

as completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Sh

Link & Rockenbach, PA discovered documents that were voluntarily produced years ago by Edwards to his potential adversaries at the 6Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). 3 EFTA00794279 time — the Razorback plaintiffs. These e-mails directly contradict Edwards' sworn testimony and pos

ah.edu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associate

that any substantive discussion of those emails will be done under seal by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and 'Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). 2Excerpts of the November 2, 2018, Hearing Transcript are attached as Exhibit A. 2 EFTA00794299 will continue to b