Epstein Secrets

provide "broad access" to relevant information. Ross I. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 980 F.2d 648, 661 (1

belief," that victims' counsel "did not speak to any current or former personnel from the Office or the FBI who were familiar with the structure of the West Palm Beach Office or with Movant's [i.e., I role (or lack thereof) in the Epstein investigation." Intervenor's Motion for Sanction at 5. The motion further complaine

civil case, Case No. 08-807346-Civ-Marra. Of course, in civil cases "liberal civil discovery rules" provide "broad access" to relevant information. Ross v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 980 F.2d 648, 661 (11th Cir. 1993). Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 should be able to avail themselves of those rules to de

belief," that victims' counsel "did not speak to any current or former personnel from the Office or the FBI who were familiar with the structure of the West Palm Beach Office or with Movant's [i.e., Reinhart's] role (or lack thereof) in the Epstein investigation." Intervenor's Motion for Sanction at 5. The motion further

cluding but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. Further, upon

On information and belief, they did not speak to any current or former personnel from the Office or the FBI who were familiar with the structure of the West Palm Beach Office or with Movant's role (or lack thereof) in the Epstein investigation. Had they done so, they would have learned that there were approximately 20 As