Epstein Secrets

w statute should apply. See Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co., 426 U.S. 148 (1976) ("It is a basic princ

olicy issues raised by your Office's invocation of § 2255. It is common ground among us that § 2255 has not been the subject of policy guidance from Main Justice, over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we are sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sh

— one that narrowly and precisely fits the facts, and another that is broad and general the narrow statute should apply. See Radzonower r. lonehe Ross /4 Co.. 426 U.S. la 0976) rft is a basic principle of statutory construction that a statute dealing with a narrow, precise. EFTA00104562 IL/ ../

olicy issues raised by your Otrice's invocation of * 2255. It is common ground among us that § 2255 has not been the subject of policy guidance from Main Justice. over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we un sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sho

GLE County Buyer Information JOHNSON. ELIZABETH ROSS EPSTEIN. JEFFREY E 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK, NY

IDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0022405 EFTA_OOPOI31 EFTA01296799 Page 75 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87203, * that was made to Main Justice or to any other District, including any documents that were transmitted to any other District regarding the conflict and regarding what was to be i

statute should apply. Sec Rothanower r. TIOIChe ROSS Cc CIL 426 t I.S. 148 (1976) (-It is a basic pri

y issues raised by your Office's invocation of § 2255. It is co m mon ground among us that Si 2255 has not been the subject or policy guidance front Main Justice. over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we are sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sh

pstein and co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adrian& Ross, Lesley Groff and Nadia Marcinkova off the hook f

d these statements have frequently been based on discovery materials. See, e.g., Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act, Main Justice, March 22, 2011 (quoting Plaintiffs' motion asserting that the U.S. Attorney's Office "deliberately misled' them and claiming that the "only reason