Epstein Secrets

rra/Johnson (S.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2015) EXHIBIT N: Ross Gow Email re. statement on behalf of Ghislaine Ma

also United States v. Bonacorsa, 528 F.2d 1218, 1221 (2d Cir. 1976). "Precise questioning is imperative as a predicate for the offense of perjury." Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). "A question is fundamentally ambiguous when it is not a phrase with a meaning about which men of ordina

2012), is instructive: Succinctly, the prosecutor did not fulfill her obligation to "pin the witness down to the specific object of [her] inquiry." Bronston, 409 U.S. at 360. Any number of straightforward follow-up questions could have clarified the object of inquiry. For example, in addition to the "at

6 III. The Questions and Answers Were Immaterial 10 CONCLUSION 10 Certificate of Service 12 i EFTA00097379 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352 (1973) 6, 7, 10 v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 1 United States v. Bonacorsa, 528 F.2d 1218 (2d C

predatory activity, and four—Sarah Kellen, Adrian Ross, Lesley Groff, and —figured in the FBI Investiga

ptVery, and I aleiutra CM to man bur acta. laiOmaa ra-Yn3 b Ps= Nano, ..aswa lawn of area. OF pHs (1•111".. Ma I. L i n G. yae ri I (Yin Ur. Bosto MA 02116 - 6'17 227 3700 IMIMI ~ten IN• /alma paaaa walla mom isaamotortymmuenmeniernmmee am ~me/Yak cvd ww ~ant &UaG.Sala 562a4)(2) • etaa

pstein and co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adrian& Ross, Lesley Groff and Nadia Marcinkova off the hook f

Edwards said Epstein's attorneys have made parts of those arguments in pre-trial hearings, and he expects them to appeal Friday's ruling. Epstein's Boston- based attorney, Martin Weinberg. told the Palm Beach Daily News he would appeal. "While respectful of the panel's decision, given issues of overridi