Epstein Secrets

ng domestic drug interdiction checkpoints "does not affect the validity of border searches or searches at places like airports"): United States v. Ross. 456 U.S. 798. 823. 102 &Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982) (explaining that while the Fourth Amendment gives protection to containers in domestic ve

those suspected of violating the law have an essential interest in readily administrable rules." Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Cnty. of Burlington, — U S —, 132 S.Ct. 1510, 1522, 182 L.Ed.2d 566 (2012). Yet the majority's holding requires border patrol agents to determine on a case-by-case an

Fax: (202) 719-7049 Kenneth A. Sweder SWEDER & ROSS, LLP 131 Oliver Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone:

Y CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on February 11, 2015 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and Burlington, ■., counsel for Plaintiff and to Kendall B. Coffey, Esquire, Coffey and COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, Attorneys for Defendant 9150 S. Dadeland Blvd.

automatically include the report of the P right to be represented by counsel, n adequate representation, to have 1 be afforded an opportunity to ross-examine witnesses who appear at tion by proffer or otherwise. idence typically consists of the overnment's sole or principal witness), AUSA. The

of any other person and the com- munity. 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3141 et seq., 3142(e). *969 James L. Sultan, Boston, Mass., with whom Joseph T. Travaline, Burlington, Mass., was on brief, for defendant, appel- lant. Diane M. Kottmyer, Boston, Mass., with whom Ernest S. Dinisco, Jane E. Serene, Sp. Attys., Will