7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
rm With Ties Chinese Communist Party Received PPP Loan. The Daily Caller <https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/02/coronavirus-ppp-china-propagandak (9/2, Ross, 716K) reports, "An American consulting firm that serves as a propagandist for Beijing received loans of up to $350,000 each under the coronavirus
s-surveillance-program-exposed-by- snowden-was-illegal-idUSKRN25T3CK> (9/2, Satter) reports that a ruling Wednesday from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit "said the warrantless telephone dragnet that secretly collected millions of Americans' telephone records violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveilla
ng domestic drug interdiction checkpoints "does not affect the validity of border searches or searches at places like airports"): United States v. Ross. 456 U.S. 798. 823. 102 &Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982) (explaining that while the Fourth Amendment gives protection to containers in domestic ve
icion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage devices at the border," Arnold, 533 F.3d at 1008, the Ninth Circuit stands alone, as it so often does. The majority likens the search of Cotterman's laptop to a "computer strip search," Majority at 966, and proceed
I'm correct. So at present we have six witnesses that we still need to depose, the three that we had alternative service for, and then we have Mr. Ross GOw, who was the defendant's agent who issued the defamatory statement, Mr. Brunel -- THE COURT: How much time do you want? MS. McCAWLEY: Sorry. We
le personal email plaintiff has ever sent or ever received in the course of however many years these accounts were open. In fact, Judge Kozinski in the Ninth Circuit allowed a civil suit against those who propounded these improper subpoenas, and that was with regard to a professional email account, as opposed t
ion from disclosure to the plaintiffs. See, e.g., Ross v. City of Memphis, 423 F.3d 596, 599 (6th Cir.
, the Fourth Circuit found jurisdiction based on Perlman in a civil case, Mezu v. Morgan State University, 495 Fed. Appx. 286, 289 (4th Cir. 2012); the Ninth Circuit has applied Perlman in a case arising under 28 U.S.C. §2255, United States v. Gonzalez, 669 F.3d 974, 977 n.2 (9th Cir. 2012), and in a civil case,
ion from disclosure to the plaintiffs. See, e.g., Ross v. City of Memphis, 423 F.3d 596, 599 (6th Cir.
, the Fourth Circuit found jurisdiction based on Perlman in a civil case, Mezu v. Morgan State University, 495 Fed. Appx. 286, 289 (4th Cir. 2012); the Ninth Circuit has applied Perlman in a case arising under 28 U.S.C. §2255, United States v. Gonzalez, 669 F.3d 974, 977 n.2 (9th Cir. 2012), and in a civil case,
ons, 64 F.3d 951, 955 (4th Cir. 1995); Franks v. Ross 313 F.3d 184, 194 (4th Cir.2002) (a cause of act
e upset that the photos had been taken without their consent. They asked the Lackawanna County Dis- trict Attorney to conduct a criminal inves- for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. EFTA00226293 DOE I CHAMBERLIN 193 Clteas2119 KM )92 (irdClr. 2002) Sexual Exploitation Act (PCASEA) against photograp
search to an email program or to specific search terms, would likely have failed to cast a sufficiently wide net to capture the evidence sought. Cf. Ross, 456 U.S. at 821, 102 S.Ct. 2157 ("When a legitimate search is under way, and when its purpose and its limits have been precisely defined, nice dis
-client privileged material Law enforcement sensitive In addition, in United States Hill, No. 05-50219, 2006 WL 2328721 (9th Cir. Aug. 11, 2006), the Ninth Circuit addressed narrow versus broad forensic searches when it rejected an argument that law enforcement should have conducted a narrow, on-site search. T
Entities connected to both Wilbur Ross and the Ninth Circuit

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Richard Kahn
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON