Epstein Secrets

Information allegedly occurred. And as made abundantly clear by the attached excerpis rom M.'s November 8, 2005 interview with Palm Beach Detective Joseph Recarey, M. she was certainly 17 by the time events "escalated" from massages to sexual conduct: • Tr. 2:5-15 M . stating that her date of birth is Oct

that her date of birth is October 10, 1987, which would have made her two da s short of 18 ears and one month old when she was interviewed by Det. Recarey on • Tr. 3:15-20 (M. stating that she first heard about Epstein from a friend "about a year ago"). • Tr. 5:14-23 ( . stating that after meeting

th Epstein was consensual. EFTA00723420 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Jennifer Gaffney, Esq. and Patrick Egan, Esq. October 26, 2010 Page 3 • See also Recarey Dep. 418:14419:5 (Recarey testifying that M. told him in November 2005 that she had consensual sex with Epstein shortly before their interview, when M.

Information allegedly occurred. And as made abundantly clear by the attached exce is rom M.'s November 8, 2005 interview with Palm Beach Detective Joseph Recarey,. was certainly 17 by the time events "escalated" from massages to sexual conduct: • Exhibit A, Tr. 2:5-15 . statin that her date of birth is •

♦. stating that after meeting Epstein for the first time, she "didn't go again for about two months or so"). • Exhibit A, Tr. 6:13-22 (♦. telling Recarey that she saw Epstein approximately 15 times in total, and "things escalated" as time went on). Furthermore, the record is undisputed that M. was at

was consensual. EFTA00723430 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Jennifer Gaffney, Esq. and Patrick Egan, Esq. October 27, 2010 Page 3 • See also Exhibit B, Recarey Dep. 418:14-419:5 (Recarey testifying that M. told him in November 2005 that she had consensual sex with Epstein shortly before their interview, when M

rior to the SORA hearing, the actual transcripts of the interviews on which the Board materials were purportedly based reveal that Palm Beach Det. Joseph Recarey, the affiant of the Probable Cause Affidavit, inaccurately summarized and repeatedly mischaracterized information that he swore under oath came fro

ear-old victim" in the Probable Cause Affidavit and the Board's Case Summary, the actual transcripts of A.D.'s November 8, 2005 interview with Det. Recarey make clear that A.D. was indisputably 17 by the time events "escalated" from massages to "sexual conduct," as defined under New York's Penal Law:

d prosecutor specializing in sex crimes cases involving children, concluded following her investigation that, "There are no real victims here." See Recarey Dep. 484:21-485:13, 506:18-507:21. In short, there is a wealth of evidence, gathered and considered by the Florida prosecutors who closely examined and