Epstein Secrets

I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal

properly charge the case before presenting it for federal investigation and prosecution. In May 2006, I met with S/A Kuyrkendall and PBPD Detective Joe Recarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recare

ecarey in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach. I do not recall whether S/A Malone was present. Detective Recarey summarized the investigation into state criminal sexual conduct involving Epstein and his personal assistants. Briefly, Epstein, through his persona

a possible "perjury trap." In the middle of this period, which started in November 2006 and ran through January 2007, USA Acosta and I traveled to Washington, DC at the beginning of December 2006 for the inaugural Project Safe Childhood Conference. Although I did not attach much significance to this at the t

P-012130 Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte

f Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel 6(e) Box #3 P-012130 Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e)

and Nesbitt Kuyrkendall regarding status of ongoing investigation, planned presentation to grand jury, continued delay in awaiting decision from Washington, DC, and problems with victims being harassed 6(e) Work Product Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 51 4/10/20084/18/2008 emails between

eet. Excluding also removes the ammunition about Detective Recarey and alleged misrepresentations of EFTA00191645

rances that she wo treated as a victim, she insisted on full immunity before she would meet. Excluding also removes the ammunition about Detective Recarey and alleged misrepresentations of EFTA00191645 statements to Recarey. also was the person who instructed the girls to say they were 18. The evid

nal Procedure Act of 1970. Section 3143(a) is a counter-pan of D.C.CT § 23-1325(b). In United States Edwards, 430 A.2d 1321 C.1 1) (en bane) the District of Columbia Court of Appeals dealt with the constitutionality of various of those provisions in an extended opinion (with some dissents on dif- ferent

f Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel 6(e) Box #3 P-012130 Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru PM 12167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e)

P-012130 Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru PM 12167 Ex Parte

estigative Privilege and regarding status of ongoing investigation, planned presentation to grand jury, continued delay in awaiting decision from Washington, DC, and • roblems with victims bein harassed P-014830 thru P-014837 4/2/2008 emails between Alex Acosta, and regarding efforts by Jay Lefkowitz a

l during their research. By then, relations between police and prosecutors were fraying. At a key meeting with prosecutors and the defense, Detective Joseph Recarey, the lead, investigator, was a no-show, according to Epsteins attorney. "The embarrassment on the.prosecutor’s face was evident when the police offic

rassment on the.prosecutor’s face was evident when the police officer never showed up for the meeting,” attorneyJack Goldberger said. Later in April, Recarey walked into a prosecutor’s office at the state attorney’s office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn. The prosecutor, Lanna Belohlavek

dvantage of the opportunity to say our peace and thank you for allowing us. There is precedent here. Ted Stevens, the Senator from Alaska case in Washington, DC, Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered an independent investigation by a private lawyer when i SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) so5-o3oo I CA/Aro

Itmorahlt: R. Alexander Acosta December 17, 2007 Page 2 which includes but k not limited to Ms. testimony: the witness transcripts: the tainted Detective Kecarey reports: and our prior submissions. In light of the concerns we raised and the evidence we discussed al the December 14 meeting, we am firmly persua

Epstein to solicit work as a masseuse. and in each instance these women were paid fir their services. 3 11w KOiPei case expressly OVC3111A1311 the bh District opinion in al(on)e when: a conviction under 7O(.03 for a defendant who offered a minor money to engage in sex with the defendant himself was ultimo