Epstein Secrets

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to l

ent to his cause of action. Moreover, discovery relating to Edwards's financial incentives to join RRA and to engage in conduct in cooperation with Rothstein in support of RRA's illicit activities is most certainly relevant to Edward's allegations in this case and Epstein's defense of the same. Accordingl

y apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00799386 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to l

ent to his cause of action. Moreover, discovery relating to Edwards's financial incentives to join RRA and to engage in conduct in cooperation with Rothstein in support of RRA's illicit activities is most certainly relevant to Edward's allegations in this case and Epstein's defense of the same. Accordingl

y apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585357 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to l

nt to his causes of action. Moreover, discovery relating to Edwards's financial incentives to join RRA and to engage in conduct in cooperation with Rothstein in support of RRA's illicit activities is most certainly relevant to Edward's allegations in this case and Epstein's defense of the same. Accordingl

ly apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE Th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585378 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin