Epstein Secrets

and other documents in the Trustee's possession, respecting the subject matter of the subpoena previously served upon the Trustee related to L.M., Scott Rothstein, Brad Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein. . . Contemporaneous with the service and filing of the privilege log, Fanner Jaffe shall provide to a reputable

RICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division In re ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A. Debtor. Chapter 11 Case

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Relief (DE 6323; re-docketed as DE 6326) and Bradley Edwards' Joinder in Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (DE 6325)i. T

issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, 15'" Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXX_XMBAG. 3 EFTA00794258 On August 14, 2018, pursua

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO. 09-347

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief. (D.E. 6326.) Edwards and L.M. joined that request. (D.E. 6325; D.E. 6345.) Movants allege that Fowler White EFTA

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34

lief, and as grounds therefore states as follows: Jeffrey Epstein issued a subpoena, through the Palm Beach State Court case of Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter

upport of Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief, and as grounds therefore states as follows: Jeffrey Epstein issued a subpoena, through the Palm Beach State Cour

b.uscourts.gov Fort Lauderdale Division In re: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, PA, Debtor. Case No. 09-34791

otion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Penn it Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [D.E. 6326] (the "Motion for Order to Show Cause"), the Responses [D.E. 6351, 6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] th

ail in Farmer Jaffe's underlying motion [DE 6326] and joined by Mr. Edwards [DE 6325], Epstein sued one of his own child victims, L.M., Edwards, and Rothstein alleging that each had committed a series of criminal acts against him and caused him damages. The lawsuit read as a whole was intended to convey t

osition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief, and as grounds therefore states as follows: INTRODUCTION Jeffrey Epstein's Motion, through one misstatement aft

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34

reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to ■., ■., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [DE 6353]. INTRODUCTION In their motion, the Victims sought sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for illega

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34

r Jaffe its Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief, that a prima facie case has been made this the Court's order has been violated, now ORDERS as follows: I. Fowler