Epstein Secrets

ey Epstein Marc S. Nurik, Esquire Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 Pho Fax: Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Law rum 1441 Brickell Avenue, 15th Floor Miami Phon Fax: Attorneys ey pstein Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL

MBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Net Worth Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 have been directed to Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, this ti day of December, 2012. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counse

t, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, moves this Honorable Court to compel timely responses to his financial discovery requests and in support would show that the Counterdefendant, through counsel, in the email attached has expressed an intention to delay the provision of responses beyond the time provided by the applicable Ru

OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXIVIBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendant(s). NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO COUNTERDEFENDANT Co

IBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Net Worth Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 have been directed to Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, this ti A clay of December, 2012. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Coun

"abuse of process" are based on the allegation that EDWARDS' discovery tactics, including the filing of RICO counts, were allegedly done to further Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. To highlight the level of bad-faith to which EPSTEIN stoops to make this allegation that EDWARDS' filing of the RICO count was someho

ighlight the level of bad-faith to which EPSTEIN stoops to make this allegation that EDWARDS' filing of the RICO count was somehow in furtherance of Rothstein's schemes and not done for proper purposes, each of the original three complaints that included a RICO EFTA00294300 02/01/2012 10:15 FAX 56168458

ntiff, Bradley J. Edwards (hereinafter EDWARDS), by and throligh his undersigned attomeys, respectfully responds in opposition to Plan tiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein's (hereinafter EPSTELN) motion for a protective orde[ and to terminate his deposition. The motion is ffivolous and should be denied