Epstein Secrets

19 THE COURT: Okay. 20 MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor may recall that the /I law firm of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler imploded as a 22 consequence of Scott Rothstein's involvement in a massive 23 Ponzi scheme. 24 That firm became the subject of bankruptcy 25 proceedings. A special master was appointed. The speci

robably very obvious to the Court. 16 Mr. Scarola suggested that upon the bankruptcy the Special 17 Master took possession of all of the records of Rothstein. 18 Of course what he meant by that was the bankruptcy 19 trustee. 20 MR. SCAROLA: Yes, I'm sorry, the Special 21 Master had them as an agent of

ended up with the order that we're talking 14 about today. IS Another point of clarification, Mr. Scarola 16 says that the order was entered over Fanner Jaffe's 17 objection. He may have had some — the law firm may have 18 had some concerns, but it's very clear it's an agreed 19 order. I don't know that th

n behalf of multiple victims of Jeffrey Epstein's serial molestation of dozens of young children. In 2009, Brad Edwards took a job as an attorney at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA") and continued the prosecution of those civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. When the RRA law firm imploded, Edwards join

the purpose of exploiting the implosion of the RRA law firm, filed a false and baseless law suit in Palm Beach Case Number 50-2009-CA-040800 against Scott Rothstein, Brad Edwards, and L.M.—one of Epstein's many child victims. In late 2009, RRA was placed into bankruptcy and a trustee, Herb Stettin, was assigned

TA00793669 confidentiality is breached or some residue or image of our documents remains at [Fowler White]." Special Master Carney took offense to Fanner Jaffe's insinuation that Jeffrey Epstein or any member of his legal team might look at the documents that were being printed at Fowler White or might retai

lm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15'h Judicial Circuit Cas

ovember 29, 2018 Via E-Mail Joseph lanno, Jr. Carlton Fields 525 Okeechobee Blvd. Suite 1200 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15'h Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMBAG In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Sout

pursue production of them further solidifies Mr. Epstein's malpractice claims. While approximately 1,600 documents from the disc were identified on Fanner Jaffe's privilege log, because Fanner Jaffe (1) produced some of the documents on its log, (2) expressly agreed to produce gtl work-product documents to Fo

3. In late 2009, Epstein sued Edwards for purportedly improperly representing his clients who were Epstein's sex abuse victims. Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "

e No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("RRA") Bankruptcy Trustee Howard Stettin, seeking to obtain documents from the Trustee, which included documents from attorne

orneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White")—would make a copy of the materials and return them to Fanner Jaffe. Because of Fanner Jaffe's obvious concern that 1 EFTA00799314 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6323 Filed 03/19/18 Page 2 of 23 Epstein or his legal counsel might misappropriate

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34

issues. DE 6353 at 5-6. This argument does not address the more basic attorney-client privileges, which have never been waived in any way. But, as Fanner Jaffe's briefing clearly explains, there has never been any waiver — either of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection — over the "key emails"