Epstein Secrets

T OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTIISTEIN. individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and EL, individually. Dcfendant(s). EXHIBIT b ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL D

s Motion to Amend Exhibit List. was not at issue as a result of Epstein's own dilatory conduct in failing to know what pleading was pending against Rothstein and failing to know whether a default had been entered. At the hearing on March 8, 2018, Epstein's trial counsel nonetheless repeatedly claimed tha

n in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: 1. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of

IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER RESETTING SPECIALLY SET JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES I. SCHEDULING This action

MBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER RESETTING SP

n in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: 1. a list of all pending motions. including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE HEARINGS shall not be h

AL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L M, individually, Defendant(s). ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING JURY TRIAL THIS CAUSE came before

XXX-MB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

n in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of

IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES I. SCHEDULING This action is set for jury

B AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER SETTING JURY

on in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE HEARINGS shall not be h

OURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTIO

other people tell you Mr. Edwards did with respect to going to other media? A: Mr. Edwards went to the media to gin up his cases in order that the Rothstein firm could generate profits, falsely taking in investors, creating false stories to the local medics [sic) and making statements to local press reg

vidually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE THE JUNE 30, 2017 AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICH DISCOVERY WAS WITHHELD UNDER CLAIMS OF PRIVILEGE Brad