Epstein Secrets

7,000 documents, privileged and not privileged, potentially responsive to a subpoena issued in the Palm Beach State Court case of Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter

UDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34

counsel and numerous pleadings were filed on these late-disclosed, privileged, and improperly retained communications, including but not limited to Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Contained Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privileg

OURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendants. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO C

XXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

o list as exhibits the week before the parties' March 13, 2018 trial date. Those documents are identified in the chart below, which was included in Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privile

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN

the falsity of Edwards' claim that he was hurt by Epstein's lawsuit and that Epstein had no reasonable basis to allege that Edwards was involved in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme using the tort claimants' cases. Finally, Epstein urges this Court to recognize that Edwards' moving to prevent Epstein from discuss

0808676 THE COURT'S MARCH 8. 2018. HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privile

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN

the falsity of Edwards' claim that he was hurt by Epstein's lawsuit and that Epstein had no reasonable basis to allege that Edwards was involved in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme using the tort claimants' cases. 'The May 23, 2018, hearing transcript is attached as Exhibit B. 5 EFTA00808662 Finally, Epstein

nctions. THE COURT'S MARCH 8, 2018. HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privile