Epstein Secrets

nt. Edwards Mitt 11 I I.24. She is also a co- defendant with Edwards in Epstein's racketeering and fraud suit against both Edwards and M. as well as Scott Rothstein. Edwards' former law partner. ee infra. Kam incorrectly states that "Imlore recent cases" in this Circuit and District have demoted the showing req

more so in light of Epstein's admission in his lawsuit against M. and others that he that he was "one of M's many `Johns.— See Complaint Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards & M s, No. 50 2009 CA0 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jud. Cir., Palm Beach Co.. Dec. 7, 2009) at 146(a), pertinent pages annexed as Ex. E to the C

6, 7. The additional topics that Rush agrees may have been discussed with an investigator working with counsel which Rush has now recalled in his Supplementary Affidavit fl 2, 3, do not materially alter the contours of the issues before the Court with regard to waiver. But, in any event, with his recollecti

nt. Edwards Mitt 11 I I.24. She is also a co- defendant with Edwards in Epstein's racketeering and fraud suit against both Edwards and M. as well as Scott Rothstein. Edwards' former law partner. ee infra. 1° Doe incorrectly states that "Imlore recent cases" in this Circuit and District have demoted the showing

ges in his complaint against M. 13 12 The document is available online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/23947743/121009-epstein. "Complaint, Epstein v. Rothstein et al., II 42(h)(i) ("M. testified that she ... worked at various strip clubs; is an admitted prostitute and call girl; has a history of illegal dru

. The additional topics that Rush agrees may have been discussed with an investigator working with Doe's counsel which Rush has now recalled in his Supplementary Affidavit fl 2, 3, do not materially alter the contours of the issues before the Court with regard to waiver. But, in any event, with his recollecti

for the Second Circuit in the appeal in the Jane Doe Action. 17. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "O" is a true and correct copy of the Judgment against Scott W. Rothstein that was entered June 9, 2010 in the criminal case entitled United States v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-cr-60331, in the U.S. District Court fo

the proceeding entitled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein. et al., Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, in the

ith exhibits, dated April 29, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Action. 14. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "L" is a true and correct copy of the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush, sworn to April 30, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Action. 15. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "M" is a true and corr