Epstein Secrets

EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE

heme singled Mr. Edwards out from among all other innocent RRA employees. Those accusations were the only source falsely linking Bradley Edwards to Rothstein's criminal enterprise, and absent those allegations there is no basis to believe that Bradley Edwards' impeccable professional reputation would hav

his Counterclaim, Edwards disclosed Dr. Jansen for the first time on his Sixth Amended Witness List with no explanation, as follows: EXPERT: 159. Bernard J. Jansen, Ph.D. (D.E. 1010.) The Court's July 20, 2017, Order Specially Setting Jury Trial required the following information at the time of listing the exp

Ponzi Scheme Money Was Spent hrip://miami.cbslocalcomr2011il2+30/rodistein-reveals-how-l-2-billion- porin-scheme-money-was-spent: The Ultimate Ponzi: Scott Rothstein Book Excerpts Reveal Juicy Details httpsurAvww.huffingtonpost.comr2Ol3103/I2fscott-rothstein-book-the-ultimate-ponzi_n_2862093.html; Scott Rothstein's Ch

wsuit against Mr. Edwards? 3 EFTA00601579 10. For brevity, I refer to the statements associating Mr. Edwards with the illegal activities of Mr. Rothstein as a result of Mr. Epstein's lawsuit as the defaming statements, the statements, or the defaming statements associating Mr. Edwards with Rothstein's

f such material results in any significant change or addition to my opinion. 22 EFTA00601598 Respectfully submitted, DATED: 20 October 2017 Dr. Bernard J. Jansen Adjunct Professor College of Information Sciences and Technology The Pennsylvania State University Universit Park, PA, 16802 Phone: Email: jjan

RT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PAGE 1. Non

40800 XXXXMB HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID F. CROW JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT RCTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and LM, Defendants. DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTI Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ("R undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fla. R. Default entered against Defendant, and asserts as follows: ASIDE

es or articles with a combined 9,669,542 potential daily visitors since the lawsuit was filed to the date that I filed this report, inclusive. Dr. Bernard J. Jansen, October 20, 2017, Report, 9115. Because of this late disclosure and change in position regarding the relevance of printed or published media conne