Epstein Secrets

TATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT Appellate Case No.: 4D18-0762 LT Case No: 502009CA0408003C3C3CXMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. MOTION TO STRIKE UNAUTHORIZED AND INAPPROPRIATE "JOINDER" FILED BY N

his case. Moreover, Epstein has been careful throughout the course of his litigation with Mr. Cassell's clients, as well as in this litigation with Rothstein and Edwards, to use initials and pseudonyms in order to maintain the identities of Mr. Cassell's 4 EFTA00805461 clients in confidence, including

, Respondents/Defendants. MOTION TO STRIKE UNAUTHORIZED AND INAPPROPRIATE "JOINDER" FILED BY NON-PARTIES Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300, moves to strike the "Joinder by Victims in Edwards' Motion for Partial Relief from Stay with Request for Expedited Consideration"

RICT Appellate Case No.: 4D18-0762 Appellate Case No.: 4D18-0787 LT Case No: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to F

gument because it will provide the necessary opportunity to fully discuss the applicable law, case history, and interrelationship of the Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards claim with the Edwards v. Epstein malicious prosecution counterclaim (that was filed in the same action only days later in 2009). Oral

N, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, requests oral argument in the consolidated appeals (Case Nos. 4D18-0762 and 4D18-0787) and as grounds states: Petitioner respectf

E STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT Appellate Case No.: 4D18-0762 LT Case No: 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS

EFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM STAY Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300, responds in opposition to the Motion for Partial Relief from Stay filed by Respondent, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards")', on March 1

00 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLIAM J. BERGER ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER 401 Fast Las Olas Boulevard, Su

ourt to impose an award of attorney's fees and costs as a sanction under the authority of 15th Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 2.303-9/08 and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410. Neither supports an award of appellate fees and costs. 09/12/2079 I CONFPIT5E4NTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00

00 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLIAM J. BERGER ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Su

GENCY MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING STAY OF DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM Petitioner, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(O, requests this Court review the order denying his Motion to Stay Disclosure of Federal Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum pen