Epstein Secrets

EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE

URLINGTON Florida Bar No. 285862 By:/s/ Nichole J. Segal NICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. 41232 /kbt 6 EFTA00613506 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Esq. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beac

dismiss), rev. denied, 81 So. 3d 414 (Fla. 2012). STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In December 2009, Appellee, Jeffrey Epstein, filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Appellant, Bradley J. Edwards, based upon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individu

34:20 voluntary (2) well-respected... told (2) turn (1) use (4) 5:16 60:2 27:14 33:24 40:15 10:17 10:25 37:12 vs (17) well-written (1) TONJA (2) two (11) 44:17 46:11 1:6 3:18 20:22 57:6 2:12,15 3:9 4:10 8:16 utilize (1) 20:22 25:10,21 went (6) tonja@tonjah... 9:13 13:3 24:8 61:3

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: Monday, January 27, 2014 TIME:

row 3 involving this case, I had no knowledge whatsoever 4 that a separate and independent action had been 5 brought by Mr. Epstein against the Rothstein 6 entities and Mr. Edwards. So to that extent, I 7 just to want let you know, as you probably already 8 did already know, that I handled those

34:20 voluntary (2) well-respected... told (2) turn (1) use (4) 5:16 60:2 27:14 33:24 40:15 10:17 10:25 37:12 vs (17) well-written (1) TONJA (2) two (11) 44:17 46:11 1:6 3:18 20:22 57:6 2:12,15 3:9 4:10 8:16 utilize (1) 20:22 25:10,21 went (6) tonja@tonjah... 9:13 13:3 24:8 61:3

lf of those persons were being prosecuted by Edwards, it was publicly disclosed that the senior partner in the law firm that employed Edwards, Sc=tt Rothstein, had conducted a fraudulent scheme which, in part, had used the claims against Epstein to induce investors to buy interests in non-existent settlem

RRA were used to further the Ponzi scheme and defraud investors =f millions of dollars. Edwards's partner at RRA and the Co-Defe=dant in this case, Scott Rothstein, plead guilty to this scheme and is serving fift= (50) years in federal prison. Several other attorneys and co-conspira=ors have plead guilty or ha

ink we should start with not 20 girls but two charges On Thursday, 22 September 2016, Darren Indyke wrote: THIS IS PART OF THE PRE-TR=AL STIP THAT TONJA WILL PROPOSE TO JACK SCAROLA. I GIVE YOU EDWARDS<=span>' PROPOSED STATEMENT AND YOURS, BUT WE CANNOT EDIT EDWARDS=/span>' PROPOSED STATEMENT. =I HAV

f of those persons were being prosecuted by Edwards, it was publicly disclosed that the senior partner in the law firm that employed Edwards, Sc=tt Rothstein, had conducted a fraudulent scheme which, in part, had used the claims against Epstein to induce investors to buy interests in non-existent settleme

RRA were used to further the Ponzi scheme and defraud investors =f millions of dollars. Edwards's partner at RRA and the Co-Defe=dant in this case, Scott Rothstein, plead guilty to this scheme and is serving fift= (50) years in federal prison. Several other attorneys and co- conspira=ors have plead guilty or hav

ut two charges On Thursday, 22 September 2016,=Darren Indyke <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvmr, );> &g=; wrote: THIS IS PART OF THE PRE-TR=AL STIP THAT TONJA WILL PROPOSE TO JACK SCAROLA. I GIVE YOU EDWARDS<=span>' PROPOSED STATEMENT AND YOURS, BUT WE CANNOT EDIT EDWARDS=/span>' PROPOSED STATEMENT. =1 HA