Epstein Secrets

ION "AG" Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, V. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plainti

RCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 2009CA0408003OOOCMB CIVIL DIVISION "AG" Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, V. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendan

al for settlement. See Bd of Motets of Florida Ad. Univ. v. Bowman, 853 So. 2d 507, 509 ,(Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("In the instant case, the language in the General Release, even:though expansive, is typical of other general releases and is clear and unambiguous. The fact „that Plaintiffs are required to release Defend

ION "AG" Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plainti

IRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXMB CIVIL DIVISION "AG" Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendan

for settlement. See Bd. of Trustees of Florida Ail. Univ. v. Bowman, 853 So. 2d 507, 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("In the instant case, the language in the General Release, even though expansive, is typical of other general releases and is clear and unambiguous. The fact that Plaintiffs are required to release Defenda

IRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXMB CIVIL DIVISION "AG" Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Def

ION "AG" Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Defendants/Counter-Plainti

l for settlement. See Bd. of Trustees of Florida Ad Univ. v. Bowman, 853 So. 2d 507, 509 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("In the instant case, the language in the General Release, even though expansive, is typical of other general releases and is clear and unambiguous. The fact that Plaintiffs are required to release Defenda

l other damages, without limitation, specifically arising out of those matters described more particularly in the action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCOTT ROTHS7'EIN individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Case No. 502009CA040800)OOCXMB-AG, pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in

ABAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintifffs), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

of America, paid to him on behalf of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and for and in consideration of the execution of the General Release attached hereto as Exhibit #2 has remised, released, and forever discharged, and by these presents does for himself, as well as his heirs, survivor