Epstein Secrets

LORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO. 4D18-0762 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, RECEIVED, 3/13/2018 5:01 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., E.W., and JANE DOE, Intervenors. Respondents / JOINDER BY VICTIMS IN EDWARDS' MOTIO

contact purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah. 7 EFTA00804568 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 4D18-0762 Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes

ral bankruptcy court order. See Supplement to Edwards' Mot. to Strike, Exhibit B at pp. 1-3. In particular, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Florida entered an explicit order that Epstein's attorneys (at the Fowler White law firm) would merely print out thousa

deposition to begin on December 12, 2011, granting a stay to the government. Epstein sought leave of the Bankruptcy Court to take the deposition of Scott Rothstein on December 1, 2011. At that time, Judge Ray denied the Motion without prejudice, because there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein.

y Edwards. The Statement of Undisputed Facts is identical to the one used for Edwards' first Motion for Summary Judgment. EFTA00808026 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ to obtain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has

the place of the now-defunct firm's management since before this case was filed. The subpoena resulted in proceedings before Honorable Judge Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, who appointed a Special Master. In response to several Orders entered by Judge Ray, Edwards filed a I59-page privilege log claiming that over 200

orney client communication privileges. Epstein has absolutely no proof, nor any reasonable basis to allege, that Edwards was in any way involved in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, yet he continues wage the instant litigation. This incredibly voluminous fishing expedition discovery is clearly intended to harass, a

: Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. PL Fort La • FL 33301 Pho c: Fax: Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 1 Rothstein Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone Fax: Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire Fowler White Burnett, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein West P B h FL

ts which are the supposed subject of his request. 9. The parties previously agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney as a special master before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to address the issues that arose in connection with the first discovery request. 10. The parties have agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney a

/mep JEFFREY EPSTErN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

orney client communication privileges. Epstein has absolutely no proof, nor any reasonable basis to allege, that Edwards was in any way involved in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, yet he continues wage the instant litigation. This incredibly voluminous fishing expedition discovery is clearly intended to harass, a

ts which are the supposed subject of his request. 9. The parties previously agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney as a special master before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to address the issues that arose in connection with the first discovery request. 10. The parties have agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney a