Epstein Secrets

CUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDAN

at certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCO7T ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, Case No 502009CA040800)OCOCMB-AG, pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in

hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of

Rothstein. For example, Epstein alleges generally that "Edwards's... actions constitute a fraud upon Epstein as [Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler], [Scott] Rothstein and the Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in good faith and with the best interests of their clients in mind at all times when in

the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm ("RRA") where Edwards worked for a short period of time). Epstein appears to allege that Edwards joined and Rothstein in fabricating sexual assault cases against Epstein to "pump" the cases to Ponzi scheme investors. As described by Epstein, investor victims were t

ng party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Snyder v. Cheezem Development Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Rule 1.510(c), Fla. R. Civ. P. Once the moving party conclusively establishes that the nonmoving party cannot prevail, it is incumbent on the nonmoving party to submit eviden

IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES I. SCHEDULING This action is set for jury

B AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER SETTING JURY

agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (1), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the m

CUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDAN

at certain incident described more particularly in Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Counterclaim filed in the Action entitled JEFFREY EPSTEIN v. SCO7T ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, Case No 502009CA040800)OCOCMB-AG, pending in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in

hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of