Epstein Secrets

CUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMEN

2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein timely filed his four (4) additional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answe

RT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PAGE 1. Non

40800 XXXXMB HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID F. CROW JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT RCTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and LM, Defendants. DEFENDANT SCOTT ROTHSTEIN'S MOTI Defendant, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN ("R undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fla. R. Default entered against Defendant, and asserts as follows: ASIDE

s moved to exclude the testimony of twenty witnesses and one category of witness that Defendant describes as "witnesses expected to be presented." (Omnibus Motion in Limine at 21-22.) In addition, until the Court determines what case will be tried (i.e., Defendant's malicious prosecution claim or Defendant's "

F THE I- 1- 1EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■., individually, Defendant(s). ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING HEARING THIS CAUSE having come to b

MBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

Supplement to Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings; Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Omnibus Motion in Limine; EFTA00595673 EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Specially Setting Hearing Response in Opposition to Jeffrey

2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

CUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMEN

Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein timely filed his four (4) additional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answe

2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

CUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMEN

Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein timely filed his four (4) additional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answe

11/8/17 hearing on Motion to Bifurcate based on 1.20 900.00 probable cause and overlapping facts of J. Epstein's abuse of process action against Rothstein in order to remove the "mini-trial" issue 750.00/hr AMM Analyze Volume I of II deposition transcript of B. Edwards (147 3.20 1,264.00 pages) da

ions; telephone conference with J. Epstein TLC Work on Response to B. Edwards' Request for Judicial Notice; work 9.80 2,205.00 on comprehensive Omnibus Motion in Limine and Appendix; work on 225.00/hr creating Appendix of documents and locating same; email with D. Vitale re depositions; work on list of p