Epstein Secrets

XXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

OURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, MOTION TO EXPAND INTERROGATORIES Bradley J. Edwards, by and

iled description of the testimony expected to be presented at trial by the witness as to each contested factual issue; ANSWER: 3. A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit expected to be introduced into evidence by the witness; ANSWER: 4. A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each e

MBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

T OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). I NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDE

by the witness as to each contested factual issue and clement of your claim against Epstein: ANSWER: See response to number 1. 4. A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit expected to be introduced into evidence by the witness: ANSWER: Unknown at this time which exhibits will be introduced throu

went well beyond legitimacy and ultimately existed to serve another master, a sinister Ponzi scheme that operated out of Edwards's and co-defendant Scott Rothstein's law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler. As is now well-known, at that law firm, despite what its name implies, the main business was the creation and

and ultimately existed to serve another master, a sinister Ponzi scheme that operated out of Edwards's and co-defendant Scott Rothstein's law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler. As is now well-known, at that law firm, despite what its name implies, the main business was the creation and perpetration of a P

ur List of Trial Witnesses, and each category/group of witnesses listed thereon, please provide with particularity the following: A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit expected to be introduced into evidence by the witness. 10. Edwards's response, "Unknown at this time which exhibits will b

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. CASE NO.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTE

PSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

escription of the testimony expected to be presented at trial by the witness as to each contested factual issue; EFTA00587140 3. A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each exhibit expected to be introduced into evidence by the witness; ANSWER: 4. A description of the Trial Exhibit List number of each e