Epstein Secrets

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION

pS1-1-z:J o Scab-? *e# sek, a X....2 -cia`;;C_ 2) 12, vlt i 6c, Az..se.kc Ay -A- en InetA ep —2 o /2. else- g e • EFTA00708802 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800)OCOEMB/Division AG Order on Epstein's Motion to Continue Hearing on Edwards' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgme

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

M BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040801:0OOCXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCT

--/;;„, g o aLevi o „Ni ,tart c.,. A144- 1..2.6b(9(5) dna.. 776- Liu/746'm / 7" 5‘->zel 33196'4- 91:1- c'c-"D°0- --274 EFTA00609375 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG Order on Epstein's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions Page 2 of 2 74 Attais 75-e- Matt 710

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I 5th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040801:0OOCXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLE

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR CLARI

also expressed the need to get the pleadings at issue before addressing discovery objections and other discovery issues. EFTA00613622 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG 3. At the hearing on September 28, 2011 on Edwards' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Co

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J

deposition to begin on December 12, 2011, granting a stay to the government. Epstein sought leave of the Bankruptcy Court to take the deposition of Scott Rothstein on December 1, 2011. At that time, Judge Ray denied the Motion without prejudice, because there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein.

y Edwards. The Statement of Undisputed Facts is identical to the one used for Edwards' first Motion for Summary Judgment. EFTA00808026 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ to obtain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

fic items: [a]II e-mails, data, correspondence, and similar documents dated April 1, 2008 through August 1, 2010 by and between Bradley J. Edwards. Scott W. Rothstein, Marc hlurik, Cam Holmes, Mike Fisten and any one of the following regarding or mentioning Jeffrey Epstein in any way: (a) the U.S. Attorney's Offi

EDWARDS. In addition, the Motion seeks authority to direct a subpoena to the Bankruptcy Trustee of the former law firm of the Defendants EDWARDS and ROTHSTEIN. The Court finds that the Amended Request for Production and request for subpoena, does request documents which the Court finds are either relevant

ument 177-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2012 Page 5 of 22 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOO134B Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLE

LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXX'XMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION

oft 72,c,_ ‹- Act-& _et. e-14 der :Jet, oi „ 0 - Joel „a(' -7--(72t 2 afrn 4)A...c.c. 1.0 citi.c. erCri .00 EFTA00616109 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG Order on Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Page 2 of 2 DONE AND QRDERED in Chambers in

ancA 7,tn..1 O2 7t Con& it-a IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXX'XMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ORDER REFERRI

EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO EDWARDS' RESPONSE IN OPP

ual allegations" in the underlying litigation. (Resp. at 2, quoting Corrected Second Amended Complaint at 2.) Edwards has EFTA00309488 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Edwards' Response misread the operative allegations of the Corrected

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800X300CMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' DAMA

EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 151° JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800X300CMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800X)CaMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING DEC 13 2011 SHARON CLERK CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION wiR.

producing any and all other contracts for legal services in the defense of criminal charges or other civil claims against EFTA00286378 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Mr. Epstein not related to the claims in the Second Amended Complaint as being irrelevant, overb

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800X)CaMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants.