Epstein Secrets

ler, P.A. E. "Money" means any tangible thing of value. F. "Trustee" means Herbert Stettin as bankruptcy trustee for RRA. 6 EFTA00722465 G. "Rothstein" means Scott W. Rothstein who pled guilty to operating the largest Ponzi scheme in south Florida history. H. "Rothstein Ponzi Scheme" means the Po

y Plaintiff's case. 6. All documents made available to any Investor or potential Investor by Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, Scott W. Rothstein or any of Scott W. Rothstein's entities to solicit "investors" for any case involving Jeffrey Epstein. 7. All document reflecting the names and addresses of all individuals or e

4. All emails exchanged between-any of the following individuals wherein Epstein, a Palm Beach billionaire or similar reference was mentioned: a. Scott Rothstein b. Russell Adler c. Michael Fisten d. Kenneth Jenne e. David Boden f. Deborah Villegas g. Andrew Barnett 9 EFTA00722468 h. Bradley Edwards

s H. Lichtman, Esq., Berger Singerman, P.A. 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 [ ] YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States Bankruptcy Court at the place, date and time specified below to testify in the above case. PLACE OF TESTIMONY COURTROOM DATE AND TIME [ X YOU ARE COMMANDED to a

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN

the falsity of Edwards' claim that he was hurt by Epstein's lawsuit and that Epstein had no reasonable basis to allege that Edwards was involved in Rothstein's Ponzi scheme using the tort claimants' cases. 'The May 23, 2018, hearing transcript is attached as Exhibit B. 5 EFTA00808662 Finally, Epstein

ers. Whether or not Fowler White and/or Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under

OURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER Bradley J E

this Court's Pre-Trial Order. 2. Included within that submission was extensive internal email correspondence from Edwards' time as an attorney at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler. These emails were admittedly obtained from a CD that Epstein's current counsel acquired from its predecessor counsel, Fowler

filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reservin

nt prosecution agreement with Edwards' counsel, whereby both parties agreed to share information relative to their claims and/or defenses related to Scott Rothstein without waiving privilege as to their communications or documents shared." Edwards' Supp. Resp. to Epstein's Mot. to Declare Relevance, July 26, 201

in this action about his anxiety over being sued by Epstein They also directly relate to Edwards' interaction with Ponzi-schemer Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and the strengthAveakness of Edwards' clients' damage claims against Epstein, both which have become critical factual issues in this case. First

n exists because the Razorback victims were outspokenly not aligned with Edwards. This is perhaps best illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by

MAN Dora Raton Fort Lomat:Sale Worn, Tallahassee hi, EFTA00616223 MAR-15-2011 TUE 05:39 PM FAX NO. P. 03/07 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15711 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND F

and states: 1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively recognized as much in a prior subpoena issued upon Mr. Stettin, RBA's T

rotective Order as to a Subpoena issued upon him for records to be produced by March 16, 2011 and states: 1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively re

DALE DIVISION CASE NO. 09-34791-BKC-RBR IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CERTIFIED Debtor. COPY

RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC (1554) April 11, 2011 The above-styled cause came on for hearing before the HONORABLE RAYMOND B. RAY, one of the Judges of the United States Bankruptcy Court, in and for the Southern District of Florida, at 299 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on Monday, April 11, 2011, c

y occurred in the course of Edwards' representation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. While an employee of the now defunct Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firm and with his current firm, Edwards filed and pursued civil lawsuits Mr. Edwards, an attorney with the FJW firm, is represen

tein was to prepare a consent order memorializing the agreement. It never did. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel production of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in t