Epstein Secrets

ten and Mr. Fandrey regarding their knowledge of Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, the Court nevertheless entered a

Also, 111 the related matter of Epstein v. Rothstein, Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, Judge Crow e

xhibit H), in which he granted a protective order regarding the depositions of Michael Fisten and Rick Fandrey, investigators previously employed by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA"). As the Court may recall, RRA represented Jane Doe prior to its implosion. 5 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 536 Entered on FLSD Doc

original counsel to the bankruptcy trustee. A I don't recall. Q Did you ever come to learn that the trustee in the bankruptcy for the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, had been subpoenaed to produce emails contained on the server of that law firm? A I don't recall. DRAFT !!!! NOT PROOFREAD

it that you saw before signing this affidavit that related to your having had a good faith basis for filing the action against Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein in December of 2018? MR. LINK: Mr. Epstein, I am going to instruct you not to answer the question. It far exceeds the scope of the deposition tha

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q Did it ever come to your attention that emails contained on the server of the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler had been produced connection with the state court civil proceedings by the bankruptcy trustee to a special master that had been appointed for purp

ctober 13, 2010 Honorable David F. Crow Palm Beach County Courthouse Room 9.1215 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Palm Beach Circuit Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB-AG Dear Judge Crow: Enclosed please find a copy of the Joint Statement pursuant to thi

, October 15, 2010. I have sent the original of this to the Clerk for filing. I have not yet received a signature page from Marc Nurik, counsel for Scott Rothstein. As soon as I receive it I will forward it to the court. Enclosure Cc: All counsel of record Respectfully submitted, ? 4.41) oseph L. Ackerman,

ntiff. Those minor females were represented for a period of time first by Bradley J. Edwards, individually, and them by the now defunct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, ("RRA") when Edwards joined that firm. Some of these lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffee, Weissing, Edwards, Fisto

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, Intervenors.' ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY S

ember 7, 2009, while Edwards was pursuing the cases noted above on behalf of his clients, Epstein filed the original Complaint here against Edwards, Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), and one of Edwards' clients, designated as ".." (App. 1). The gravamen of the Complaint was that after Edwards had filed those cases

s ".." (App. 1). The gravamen of the Complaint was that after Edwards had filed those cases against Epstein, he had briefly joined the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), which subsequently imploded after Rothstein was charged with (and later pled guilty to), operating a Ponzi scheme (App.1). Rothstein

Edwards's Counterclaim. In support thereof, Epstein states as follows: FACTS Epstein originally filed this action to recover damages from Defendant Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Edwards, based upon Epstein's well-founded belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknow

aim. In support thereof, Epstein states as follows: FACTS Epstein originally filed this action to recover damages from Defendant Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Edwards, based upon Epstein's well-founded belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners,

ls, and other unknown partners, engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal pyramid scheme operated through their law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler. Rothstein himself admitted to, and was convicted for, this pyramid scheme, which featured civil cases against Epstein in which Edwards was lead co

EFTA00792812 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: We are here on Epstein versus Rothstein and Edwards. The two applicable parties being dealt with -- have a seat, please. Thank you. -- being Mr. Epstein and Mr. Edwards, and the counter

ut of millions of dollars, claims of outrageous sums of money were made on behalf of alleged victims across the board, and the only way, in fact, Scott Rothstein sits in jail. And what I have read in the paper, claims that I settled cases for $200 million, which is totally not true. She has made claims of

through these and -- let me zoom in. On this top line are all of those circumstances subsequent to 4/9/09 when Bradley Edwards became a member of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, which counsel says gave raise to a reasonable suspicion that Bradley Edwards was a knowing participant in the Ponzi scheme and was using fabrica

3, 2009. Jane Doe is represented by the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA"), which as been in the

3, 2009. Jane Doe is represented by the law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA"), which as been in the news regarding alle