Epstein Secrets

UIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. NOTICE OF HEARING- UMC PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has set down for hear

. Ganetis; CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT; Lisa B. Toney; Lilly Ann Sanchez Jacqueline M. Borrero; Michelle S. Ganetis; Susan Aprill; Vicki Passy Epstein v. Rothstein - Signing and filing of NOH Epstein M/P/O Please see in directory 80743, our Notice of Hearing on Epstein's M/P/O from Making Extra-Judicial Statem

Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 161. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communic

D FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. / DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTE

, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually

cretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (

D FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, ead-laiadividually3 Defendants. DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S

, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individu

cretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910

AIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.: 80743 Espirito Santo Plaza Fourteenth Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 www.fowler.white.corn Christopher E

ubstantial and imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the

AIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.: 80743 Espirito Santo Plaza Fourteenth Floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 www.fowler•white.com Christopher E.

ubstantial and imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the