Epstein Secrets

suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural choices. Itamar's system *is* suitable to hook up to a cognition system, because it has both feedforward and

the best) but the fact that it achieves GOOD (even if not the best) classification accuracy via an architecture with so much biological realism. Itamar's architecture, like that of Jeff Hawkins (but unlike Poggio's), does not aspire to detailed biological realism. This allows it to use recurrent co

tinguishing cats vs. dogs" because Jeff Hawkins >> likes to give speeches about how hard the problem of distinguishing >> cats vs. dogs is (because Hawkins' Numenta vision system can't solve >> it). And of course if a famous guy like Hawkins speechifies about it, » it must be important ;-D >> So when

n Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Ben Goertzel < > wrote: Hi, OK, I'll try to keep this reply "as simple as possible but no simpler ... To compare Itamar's emotion recognition to Poggio's, you would need to run both systems on the same corpus of videos, divided into the same set of categories, and th

suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural choices. Itamar's system *is' suitable to hook up to a cognition system, because it has both feedforward and

the best) but the fact that it achieves GOOD (even if not the best) classification accuracy via an architecture with so much biological realism. Itamar's architecture, like that of Jeff Hawkins (but unlike Poggio's), does not aspire to detailed biological realism. This allows it to use recurrent co

To: Jeffre E UMn'eevacalion mail.com From: Sent on Subject: Re: As a general rule, Hawkins thinks the only good work is done by Hawkins and his employees ;-) I.e., he is extremely sure he has the One True Path ... far more so than all th

es ;-) I.e., he is extremely sure he has the One True Path ... far more so than all the rest of us egomaniacs.... I doubt that Poggio knows about Itamar's work, but I suspect he would like it. Regarding perception processing, Itamar has the same basic philosophy as Poggio ... the difference is that

suitable to be hooked up to a cognition system due to the lack of recurrent connections. Jeff Hawkins' vision system is not suitable either because Hawkins has made some very poor architectural choices. Itamar's system *is* suitable to hook up to a cognition system, because it has both feedforward and

ot the best) but the fact that it achieves GOOD (even if not the best) classification accuracy via an architecture with so much biological realism. Itamar's architecture, like that of Jeff Hawkins (but unlike Poggio's), does not aspire to detailed biological realism. This allows it to use recurrent co

t Systems Workshop (PerAfIS 2008), 2008. MW07. Stephen Morgan and Christopher Winship. Counterfactuals a

ool) and identify the key objects in the scene and their relationships. • Social Attention - Example task: The robot is having a conversation with Itamar. which is giving the robot reward (for instance, by teaching the robot useful inkrinat ion). Conversations with other individuals in the room have

ligent Systems Workshop (PerMIS 2008), 2008. W07. Stephen Morgan and Christopher Winship. Counterfactuals a

school) and identify the key objects in the scene and their relationships. e Social Attention — Example task: The robot is having a conversation with Itamar, which is giving the robot reward (for instance, by teaching the robot useful information). Conversations with other individuals in the room have not