Epstein Secrets

2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and those wishing to receive speech.”); see also Stephens v. Cty. ofAlbemarle, Va., 524 F.3d 485,492 (4th Cir. 2008) (providing that a plaintiff has “standing to assert a right to receive speech” by “showing

t serves “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State ofFlorida, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’ function as a vital 16 1 CA/Aronberg-000132 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH

2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and those wishing to receive speech.”); see also Stephens v. Cnty. of Albemarle, VA, 524 F.3d 485, 492 (4th Cir. 2008) (providing that a plaintiff has “standing to assert a right to receive speech” by “show[

he public “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State ofFlorida, 210 So.3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’s function as a vital source ofinformation is weakened whenever the ability ofjo

2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and those wishing to receive speech.”); see also Stephens v. Cty. ofAlbemarle, Va., 524 F.3d 485,492 (4th Cir. 2008) (providing that a plaintiff has “standing to assert a right to receive speech” by “showing

t serves “unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State ofFlorida, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’ function as a vital 16 CA/Aronberg-000132 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH

01) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and those wishing to receive speech.”); see also Stephens v. Cty. of Albemarle, Va., 524 F.3d 485, 492 (4th Cir. 2008) (providing that a plaintiff has “standing to assert a right to receive speech” by “show

ury.” NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 16 ACTIVE 696232185v3 Gainesville Woman Care, LLC v. State of Florida, 210 So. 3d 1243, 1263 (Fla. 2017); see also Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 711 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (noting that “the press’ function as a vital source of information is weakened whenever the ability of