Epstein Secrets

t Tarbutton, John M. Popilock, Sean P. Car- ter, Stephen A. Cozen, Cozen O'Connor (Philadelphia), Philade

Washington), William Horace Jeffress, Jr., Christopher R. Cooper, Sara E. Kropf, Jamie S. Kilberg, Baker Botts LLP (DC), Christopher Mark Curran, White & Case LLP (DC), David Charles Frederick, John Christopher Rozendaal, Mark Charles Hansen, Michael John Guz- man, Michael K. Kellogg, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen,

c.), a New York corporation ("ERG Member"), (ii) Stephen P. Hanson, an individual residing in New York, Ne

klin 591 W. Putnam Avenue NEWYORK MI MI (2k) -41- EFTA00614236 Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 Attention: Ellis Rinald* Esq. Facsimile: and to: White & Case LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Attention: Scott A. B er Esq. Facsimile: If to BRO: Stephen Hanson President & CEO 206

l Roger M. Carr Jose Carreras Cynthia Carroll Stephen A. Carter John Casey Pete Cashmore Alessandro

ce Commissioners (NAIC) Unilever KPMG Americas Renova Group J. Craig Venter Institute Nomura International Plc DuPont de Nemours and Company White & Case LLP Alcatel-Lucent Le Temps Louis Dreyfus Group University of California. San Diego (UCSD) Sanofi-Aventis Caisse des Depots et Consignations (CDC

Officer Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd Switzerland Stephen van Coller Paul Collier Francis S. Collins Tij

tzerland Russian Federation USA Hungary USA Switzerland Singapore USA Switzerland United Kingdom Peru DuPont de Nemours and USA Company White & Case LLP USA Alcatel-Lucent SA Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson The Abraaj Group Le Temps France Sweden United Kingdom Switzerland World Economic Fo

re limited liability company (the "Company") and Stephen P. Hanson (the "Executive'). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS

& Franklin 591 W. Putnam Avenue Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 Attention: Ellis Rinaldi, Esq. With copies (which shall not constitute notice) to: White & Case LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Attention: Scott Berger, Esq. If to the Executive: With copies (which shall not constitute

2 L.Ed.2d 780 (1989) (objection to reasonable doubt instruction in state court sufficient to exhaust constitutional claim premised on same issue); Hawkins v. West, 706 F.2d 437, 439 (U Cir.1983) (same). As a result, we conclude that by contending that the trial court misapplied Florida law and allow

. Comisky, Matthew D. L Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA, J. Tenvillinger III, John M. Gidley, Christo- pher M. Curran, (Argued), Lucius B. Lau, White & Case LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Stolt—Nielsen S.A. and Stott- Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. Roberta D. Liebenberg, Allen D. Black, (Argued), G