Epstein Secrets

mental principles of separation of powers, courts cannot judicially alter the wording of statutes where the Legislature clearly has not done so."); Hawkins v. Ford Motor Co., 748 So. 2d 993, 1000 (Fla. 1999) ("[T]his Court may not rewrite statutes contrary to their plain language."). "[R]elevant to the

the conjunction."); Bodden, 877 So. 2d at 685 ("[T]he legislature is presumed to know the meaning of words and the rules of grammar[.]"); see also Gaffney v. Riverboat Servs. of Ind., Inc., 451 F.3d 424, 459 (7th Cir. 2006) (stating that use of the participle "including" generally implies an illustrati

ld consent to designating Mr. Epstein low risk. Stephen Weber, a former member of the board of examiners

torney who oversaw the Epstein case in Florida would come speak to them about his investigation, Ms. Musumeci wrote in a Dec. 10, 2010, email to Ms. Gaffney and Mr. Egan in the Manhattan district attorney's office. The Manhattan prosecutors declined the offer, but they contacted then-current officials a

ld consent to designating Mr. Epstein low risk. Stephen Weber, a former member of the board of examiners

torney who oversaw the Epstein case in Florida would come speak to them about his investigation, Ms. Musumeci wrote in a Dec. 10, 2010, email to Ms. Gaffney and Mr. Egan in the Manhattan district attorney's office. The Manhattan prosecutors declined the offer, but they contacted then-current officials a