Epstein Secrets

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP By: By: Stephen D. Susman Stephen M. Sinaiko Counsel for Claima

the Respondent Releasees, including Representative Claims and any Claims that any Claimant asserted or could have asserted in the Arbitration, the Action; or the Consolidated Action, that in any way arise out of, are connected with or relate to: (a) any of the HG Funds or the ABS Funds (together, the

s. Dated: August 2011 Susman Godfrey LLP By: Stephen D. Susman 560 Lexington Avenue, 15th Floor New

ds 2 Settlement Payment. - 5- I KU ,11,11c2 %in= EFTA00615379 2.1 In consideration of the dismissal with prejudice of the Arbitration and the Action and the releases in favor of the Respondent Releasees by Claimants set forth in paragraph 3.1, and in full and final satisfaction of all Claimant Re

71 31 654.6686 E-MAIL issus.,450s.A.004wArce.om Stephen M. Sinaiko KRAMER LEVIN NAFTAILIS & FRANKEL LLP

ownership interest in any of the Funds. 2. Settlement Payment. 2.1 In consideration of the dismissal with prejudice of the Arbitration and the Action and the releases in favor of the Respondent Releasees by Claimants set forth in - 5 - EFTA00283095 paragraph 3.1, and in full and final satisfact

s. Dated: August 2011 Susman Godfrey LLP By: Stephen D. Susman 560 Lexington Avenue, 15th Floor New

s, affiliates, parents and subsidiaries. 2. Settlement Payment. 2.1 In consideration of the dismissal with prejudice of the Arbitration and the Action and the releases in favor of the Respondent Releasees by Claimants set forth in paragraph 3.1, and in full satisfaction of all Claims asserted and/o

mines the ap- plicable clergy privilege."), 2 Stephen A. Saltzburg, Michael M. Martin & Daniel J. Capr

ose would be to sanction Rosenbaum for his alleged un- authorized disclosures of his clients' privi- leged information in his Request for Judi- cial Action and at the April 16 hearing, enjoin Rosenbaum from future similar con- duct, determine whether Rosenbaum vio- lated Florida Bar Rules of Professiona

ates, 481 U.S. 787 (1987) 24 Other Authorities Stephen Rex M, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to

or Boies Schiller had anything to do with the Government's decision to convene a grand jury to look into the matters that were the subject of the Action. On the contrary—the Government has advised the Court that it contacted Boies Schiller as part of its search for parties who might have been victim

and Mary McCarthy," 5/11/80 New York Times 2 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined

or Boies Schiller had anything to do with the Government's decision to convene a grand jury to look into the matters that were the subject of the Action. On the contrary—the Government has advised the Court that it contacted Boies Schiller as part of its search for parties who might have been victim