Epstein Secrets

form. A Fifth. Q Has Jeffrey Epstein instructed you to lie to his Probation Officer in any way? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Mr. Visoskl testified that you took a helicopter flight within the last year with Jeffrey Epstein to Miami. Do you remember that flight? MR. YAREMA: Object t

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in either 2001 or 2002? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Did you, in fact, call A.G. to come to Jeffrey Epstein's home and give him a massage in a sexual nature in 2001 or 2002? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Dld you

for a massage of a sexual nature? MR. YAREMA: Object to the Iona. A Fifth. Q Did Jeffrey Epstein tell you it was his intent during the course of A.G.'s visit to his home to persuade, induce or entice her to engage in sexual activity? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Didn't Jeffrey Ep

ted SEMEpstain's number one co-conspirator who was actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper (Louel la Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxburgh, (Hammond and Roxburgh were not deposed, but the others were.) See depositions of these individu

ouel la Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxbur

sonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. I1(b). Rule 1 1 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d I251, 1255 (11th ar. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were factu

ouel la Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxbur

Kellen (Epstein's number one co-conspirator who was actually named as such in the WA), his housekeeper (Louel la Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxburgh, (Hammond and Roxburgh were not deposed, but the others were.) See depositions of these individu

reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan'. Daimleravysler, A.G., 331 F.3d I251, 1255 (11th ar. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were factu