3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:44 PM To: Larry Visoski Subject: Re: Customer interest in GE OnPoint yes On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Larry Visoski =gt; wrote: GE OnPoi=t needs more Data, I know fo
past 10 years, Steve indicated he prefers the lower time e=gine, in email below, May I =equest from Husham more Data for GE to review? Thank you Larry Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded mess=ge: <mailto From: "McManus= Steve (GE Aviation, US)" < > Date: December 13= 2016 at 12:22:34 PM EST T
: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:44 PM To: Larry Visoski Subject: Re: Customer interest in GE OnPoint y
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:44 PM To: Larry Visoski Subject: Re: Customer interest in GE OnPoint yes On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Larry Visoski =gt; wrote: GE OnPoi=t needs more Data, I know for a fact that Husham does not hanger this BB.
From: Lany Visoski clia> To: Je vacation <[email protected]> S
btaining US Certificate of Airworthiness with his DAR representative in Europe. With that being said,. Do you agree its important that we must have GE OnPoint program approved and enrolled in order to Close? And install the original engine that belongs on the plane? Should I brief Darren on this topic? If
From: Larry Visoskillina> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 8:53 PM To: Je vacation Subject: GE Jeffrey Steve Manus GE OnPoint Sales rep just walked into doctor oppoint
016 8:53 PM To: Je vacation Subject: GE Jeffrey Steve Manus GE OnPoint Sales rep just walked into doctor oppoint, he did inf=rm his program for GE OnPoint is not a catastrophic cost to enroll and we a=e covered 100% when we do„I didn't get a chance to mention GE's position o= Low margin, Maybe this co
Entities connected to both Larry Visoski and GE OnPoint