Epstein Secrets

HOOK QTRS STE 8-3 ST THOMAS. VI 00802- 1348 575 LEXINGTON AVE FL 4 NEW YORK. NY 10022- 6146 116 NASSAU AVE APT 2 BROOKLYN, NY 11222- 4024 3: VISOSKI, LAWRENCE 1132 SAN MICHELE WAY 261-45-XXXX (561) 776-1533 2/1960 PAUL PALM BEACH GARDENS. (772) 546.3023 VISOSKI, LARRY P FL 33418-6704 DRES

ENCE 1132 SAN MICHELE WAY 261-45-XXXX (561) 776-1533 2/1960 PAUL PALM BEACH GARDENS. (772) 546.3023 VISOSKI, LARRY P FL 33418-6704 DRESOSKI, LAWRENCE P WISOSKI, LARRY P 1635 SW SILVER PINE BISOSKI, LAWRENCE P WAY APT 109-F1 WISOSKI, LAWRENCE P PALM CITY, FL 34990-4732 BISOSKI. LARRY P JR VISOSKI, LAWR

NEW YORK NY 10065- 7007 1000 VENETIAN WAY APT 801 MIAMI BEACH. FL 33139- 1043 16 ISLAND AVE APT 7D MIAMI BEACH. FL 33139- 1331 15: MORRISON, LARRY 11148 COBBLEFIELD RD 301-42-XXXX (561) 798-6544 11/1956 EUGENE WELLINGTON. FL 33449- (561) 798-8185 8325 6100 RED HOOK QTRS STE B-3 ST THOM

. (772) 546.3023 VISOSKI, LARRY P FL 33418-6704 DRESOSKI, LAWRENCE P WISOSKI, LARRY P 1635 SW SILVER PINE BISOSKI, LAWRENCE P WAY APT 109-F1 WISOSKI, LAWRENCE P PALM CITY, FL 34990-4732 BISOSKI. LARRY P JR VISOSKI, LAWREMCE P 12472 SE PLANDOME DR VISOSKI, LAWRENCE R HOBE SOUND, FL 33455- VIS

4732 BISOSKI. LARRY P JR VISOSKI, LAWREMCE P 12472 SE PLANDOME DR VISOSKI, LAWRENCE R HOBE SOUND, FL 33455- VISOSKI LAWRENCE. 7918 LAWRENCE P VISOKI, LARRY P 220 ZORRO RANCH RD PAUL VISOSKI. STANLEY, NM 87056-9783 LAWRENCE JR VISOK. LAWRENCE P 1635 SW SILVER PINE WAY APT Fl PALM CITY, FL 3

76 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87203, * already served their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures (DE 266 at 13), and although this Court has repeatedly held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding," the Government maintains that the rule governing initial disclosures in civil litigation

t in and/or awareness of the Government's • • witness, subject, or t ' investigation, includin Ghislaine Maxwell, Lesley Groff, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (including

er information (including, for example, e- mails) that were sent to. conied to, or sent by Reinhart in which the word "Epstein," _ ' "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," "Villafana, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sa

e victims were not properly notified about event during that investigation. 59. RFP No. 25 requests all initial productions that are required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is a protective request to ensure that, should it be determined that the Civil Rules apply, they then receive all materials to whic

his housekeeper his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxbur

cally, he represented (Epstein's number one co-conspirator who was actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxburgh. (Hammond and Roxburgh were not deposed, but the others were.) See depositions of these individu

we are also writing to ask for your non-opposition to Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4's motion to intervene in the case. As you know, Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows intervention on two grounds: Mandatory intervention is allowed where a putative intervenor "claims an inter relating to the . . .

tation during the civil process but also paid for legal representation for (Epstein's executive assistant and procurer of girls for him to abuse), Larry Visoski (Epstein's personal pilot), Dave Rogers (Epstein's personal pilot), Larry Harrison (Epstein's personal pilot), Ghislaine Maxwell (manager of Epste

nt and procurer of girls for him to abuse), Larry Visoski (Epstein's personal pilot), Dave Rogers (Epstein

al place of abode with Mark, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there . . . ." 8. The foregoing service constituted proper service the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(B). Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an answer to a properly served complaint must be filed withi

ney Bruce Reinhart's involvement in and/or awareness of the Government's witness, subject, or tar et o Ghislaine Maxwell, ▪ Investigation Includi Larry Mo iso i 1 ogers, r lam Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (inclu

respondence, and other information (including, for example, e- mails) that red to, or sent by Reinhart in which the word "Epstein," " "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh,' r afana, " "Florida SS Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian,"' "Sanchez," "358

ell). Id. The Court then noted: "Because the Court will allow this limited factual development, it is unnecessary to decide here whether the CVRA or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide discovery rights in this context. The Court therefore reserves ruling on [the victims'] motion [for an order directing the Govern

r information including, for example, e- mails) that were sent to, copied to, or sent by in which the word "Epstein," "Kllen "Ruboyo," "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," S, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez,"

e victims were not properly notified about event during that investigation. 59. RFP No. 25 requests all initial productions that are required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is a protective request to ensure that, should it be determined that the Civil Rules apply, they then receive all materials to whic

nce, and other information including, for example, e- mails) that were sent to copied to, or sent by in which the word "Epstein," ' " "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr... " "Black" "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez,"

e victims were not properly notified about event during that investigation. 59. RFP No. 25 requests all initial productions that are required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is a protective request to ensure that, should it be determined that the Civil Rules apply, they then receive all materials to whic