Epstein Secrets

ege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02971 10/14/2009 Larry Visoski depo Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 123 EFTA00296251 Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION Visoski depo irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07595-07604 05/20

not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at I Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

pencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards RE:Meeting w.Stanely Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 11585-11586 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley Edwards RE:Epstein;Larry Visoski confirmed Joint W/P Priv. 11675-11676 10/29/2009 Stuart Mermelstein Bradley Edwards RE:Leslie Wexner attorney info Joint W/P Priv. 3 EFTA00

/14/2009 Jacquie Johnson Adam Horowitz Depo of Larry Visoski Joint W/P Priv. 04640-04641 10/14/2009 Bradley

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

y calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02971 10/14/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley Edwards Larry Visoski depo Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

4 EFTA00310171 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION Visoski depo irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07595-07604 05/20

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

pencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards RE:Meeting w.Stanely Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 11585.11586 10/14/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley Edwards RE:Epstein;Larry Visoski confirmed Joint W/P Priv. 11675-11676 10/29/2009 Stuart Mermelstein Bradley Edwards RE:Leslie Wexner attorney info Joint W/P Priv. 3 EFTA00

/14/2009 Jacquie Johnson Adam Horowitz Depo of Larry Visoski Joint W/P Priv. 04640-04641 10/14/2009 Bradley

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

y calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02971 10/14/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley Edwards Larry Visoski depo Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

24 EFTA00602958 Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissine. Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION Visoski depo irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07595-07604 05/20

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

derage minor female despite the age? 18 MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. 18 MR. YAREMA: Object to the fonn. 19 A Fifth. 19 A Filth. 20 Q Mr. Visoski testified that you took a 20 Q What is the youngest female you have 21 helicopter flight within the last year with 21 witnessed or observed Jef

44 22 one: 22 23 (Via tekpbone) 23 24 24 25 25 Page 6 Page 8 I Appearances contimied... 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 On behalf of the Plaintiff. Jane Doe II: 3 ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA, ESQUIRE 2 — — — GARCIA EI.K1NS & BOEHRINGER 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video 4 I record. This is Media No.