Epstein Secrets

y M. Farber, Carl D. Glickman, Michael Goldstein, Alan C. Greenberg, Donald J. Harrington, JP Morgan Ch

the mandamus petition is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that he lacks an adequate, alternative means of obtaining relief. See In re von Bulow, 828 F.2d 94, 98 (2d Cir. 1987). Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA. Issued As Mandate: 11/13/2009. (nd) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 Transm

d" therefrom. Id. at 6. The court also ordered Cooper & Kirk to "cease use of the [] materials in its preparation of Plaintiff's action against Mr. Dershowitz." Id. 11 EFTA00074920 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page19 of 38 Ms. Maxwell filed a motion to reconsider on July 29, 2020.

, 828 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987) 20 In re Sims v. Blot, 534 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2008) 14 In re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011) 9 In re von Bulow, 828 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1987) 14 ii EFTA00074906 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page5 of 38 Martindell v. Int'l Tel. & Tel. C

en & Sir- cusa ("RMJS"), and others, principally Alan Garfinkel and Leigh Katzman, form- ing Katzman Ga

n there are federal law claims in a case also presenting state law claims, the fed- eral rule favoring admissibility ...I the controlling rule."); von Bulow von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 141 ( d Cir.I987) (holding that federal law controlled question of privilege where federal civil RICO claims were jo