Epstein Secrets

preciate your taking the time to clarify the record. I learned that you had been "retained to provide opinions as an expert on legal ethics" in v. Dershowitz following the August 27, 2019 public hearing in US v. Epstein. I learned of your role in theaase by reading your affidavit, dated June 7, 2019, whi

alification from representing Ms. Guiffre (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Tum the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would f

appreciate your taking the time to clarify the record. I learned that you had been "retained to provide opinions as an expert on legal ethics" in Dershowitz following the August 27, 2019 public heating in US v. Epstein. I learned of your role in the case by reading your affidavit, dated June 7, 2019, wh

Boles' disqualification from representing (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would

ised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's motion is relatively straightforward, and in my view, a public hearing is clearly, nevertheless, the pre

that cites no authority, and I believe there is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection with litigation that we've SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00020044 --- PAGE BREAK ---

FTA00020044 --- PAGE BREAK --- 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or Professor Green himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But