Epstein Secrets

tionship between.Acosta, his line prosecutor~and Ep~tein' s t~a111 of lawyers .. His phalan;x: of lawyers indud~.d note~ Hal'Vard.law professor Ala:nDershowitz and:Kenneth I Starr, the former U.S. solicitor ienetal whose investigation led to the impeachment of Presfdent Clinton. Marra descripes an OcJob~

frienc:ls ;1,n9 c1dmir<:!rs 1 according to tlle magazine; include prominent businessmen, academics and ~ckntists and famed Hi!rvard law·prof<:!ssor Alan Dershowitz. hltps://www. pa lrnbea ch post corri/news/20080701 find ictrne nt-bil Ii onaire-sol jcited-3-tirnes . .... l.-. CA/Aronberg-0O1021 FILED: PALM B

FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:27:00 PM 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J8RPEPS2 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or Professor Green himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But reg

Schumer. Goldberger is one of five attorneys Epstein has retained since he became the subject of an investigation, Edmondson said. Among the others: Alan. Dershowitz, the well-known Harvard law professor and author, who is a friend of Epstein- Dershowitz Could not be reached forcomment. Police said the

• "A prosecutor has to look at it in a much broader fashiori," a ~t.ite attorney's spokesman said last'\veek. Epstein hired Harvard law Professor Alan Dersho:witz whel} he._peaJ.m.e ;iware h~was under investigation, artd. Dershowitz,gave prosecutors information that some of tp.e alleged victims had spok

n a serious Way," she fold the Associated Press. Dershow.itz 'has-vehemently dented Guiffre'.s claims. N.

pstein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's motion

that cites no authority, and I believe there is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection with litigation that we've SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00103958 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

T REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00103958 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or Professor Green himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But

ct his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection w

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

that cites no authority, and I believe there is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection with litigation that we've SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00106135 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

T REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00106135 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or Professor Green himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But

ct his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection w

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

tes no authority, and I believe there 23 is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his 24 right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who 25 has retained him in connection with litigation that we've SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00076235 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9

T REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00076235 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But regardless of t

is 24 right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who 25 has retained him in connecti

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

that cites no authority, and I believe there is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection with litigation that we've SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00077462 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

T REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00077462 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or Professor Green himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But

ct his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection w

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

that cites no authority, and I believe there is no authority for his proposition. I entirely respect his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection with litigation that we've SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00080210 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

T REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00080210 52 J8RPEPS2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 brought against Mr. Dershowitz, but I would have expected that the Law Journal or Professor Green himself would have disclosed that connection, which I think is a conflict. But

ct his right to advocate on behalf of his client Alan Dershowitz, who has retained him in connection w

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

tein or his estate or to anyone in an Epstein-related case. I did serve as an expert witness, by way of expert declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm ha v. Dershowitz, 1:19-cv-03377 (SDNY), a pending defamation case that might be described as "Eps

ess, by way of expert declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm

stein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal." Later in the hearing, attorney David Boies made comments consistent with those of the court. Just to clear up the evident misunderstanding: I hav

Epstein or his estate or to anyone in an Epstein-related case. I did serve as an expert witness, by way of e t declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm i v. Dershowitz, 1:19-cv-03377 (SDNY), a pending defamation case that might be described as "Epst

itness, by way of e t declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm

stein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal." Later in the hearing, attorney David Boies made comments consistent with those of the court. Just to clear up the evident misunderstanding: I hav

tein or his estate or to anyone in an Epstein-related case. I did serve as an expert witness, by way of expert declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm in Giuffre v. Dershowitz, 1:19-cv-03377 (SDNY), a pending defamation case that might be described

ess, by way of expert declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm

stein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal." Later in the hearing, attorney David Boies made comments consistent with those of the court. Just to clear up the evident misunderstanding: I hav

ess, by way of expert declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm

tein or his estate or to anyone in an Epstein-related case. I did serve as an expert witness, by way of expert declaration, in support of Professor Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Mr. Boies and his law firm inn. Dershowitz, 1:19-cv-03377 (SDNY), a pending defamation case that might be described as "Epste

stein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal." Later in the hearing, attorney David Boies made comments consistent with those of the court. Just to clear up the evident misunderstanding: I hav