Epstein Secrets

edaidOn to all other rights end roman to with Lnider may be waded upon Default DEFAULT. Each re the fokevino eh I _Atte . Evet of Den under this Arlan Payment Weill Canter hint to make my isnot then due Older the Indeblednetee *him !Mat Chmetor fat.: to cone* mat CM tO Pfhtfm ay othefhtfrAoaleell

Oste el the bas nand net be mein to mare upon may Amnia Winn voLtitery or as a ran of dean). eص as OthavAr.o taffeta by kw. LX;µ har Eve kroponm. Barone may my nand penny a 0," • peen of in ran owed «rib ewe. It Is b.:43. Earn payments will not urn, man b by Lends' In vmen, reravn Bueagt of Carmen a

n eayeence tat 01.14eNaat Caottng Y• Momerisnal Alan-nee C =CS %Beg R. *Ice Mal Redeye! Verizon Wir

1:40A 0 Palm Beata FL ValmbeactrFL Y Included 449 08110 0224A 0 Palm Beach FL OpimbeectiFL Y incluthx, 450 0619 11.514 0 Palm Beach FL Barone/I FL V !acme° Page 12 Of 21 Leap distance end ether Charge* 704el .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 AO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

sputed facts submitted by Mr. Edwards in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, Edwards had a sound legal basis for believing that Donald Trump, Allen Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield and Governor Bill Richardson had relevant and discoverable information (Exhibit “A” — Edwards’ Statem

atto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)). The usual case of abuse of process involves some form of extortion. Scozari v. Barone, 546 So. 2d 750, 751(Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (citing Bothmann v. Harrington, 458 So. 2d 1163, 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)). That is exactly what has transpired

Exhibit “N” at 913. | 72. Edwards provided notice that he intended to depose Alan Dershowitz. Edwards possessed a legitimate basis for doing so: (a) Dershowitz is believed to have been friends with Epstem for many years; (b) in one news article Dershowitz comments that, “I’m on my 20th book... The only pers