Epstein Secrets

- tiff. Olnick, Boxer, Blumberg, Lane & Troy by Andrew N. Krinsky, New York City, for defendant Samuel

rican Airlines had made "a • compelling argument for recognition of a limited common law privilege for the ASAP materials." Id. at 1533. Relying on Jaffee, Judge Marcus found that he had the ability "to recognize new privileges, consistent with Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, in cases arisin

and will not become part of the public record. Andrew Levi, a partner at Lehr Levi & Mendez in Miami an

ionship, unlike the confidential relationship of a doctor and patent or attorney and client, warrants no privilege beyond the terms of Rtle 410. See Jaffee. 518 U.S. at 10, 116 S. Cf. at 1928. But the victims would enjoy an evidentiary benefit from the disclosure of plea negotiations to prove whether th

Electronic Communication Title: (3//FOUO) PRICE ANDREW AND THE 17-YEAR OLD GIRL HIS SEX OFFENDER FRIEN

d PRINCE ANDREW (ANDREW ALBERT CHRISTIAN EDWARD), DUKE OF YORK. CHURCHER told that she wanted a quick story ab

INCE ANDREW at CLUB TRAMP and stated he is the worst dancer in the world. PRINCE ANDREW was grabbing her waist and fondling her on the dance floor. PRINCE ANDREW's security personnel were outside the club. It seemed that no one at the club recognized him. They stayed at CLUB TRAMP for an hour or hour and a hal

ld be dancing with the Queen's son, referring to PRINCE ANDREW, Duke of York. and MAXWELL went shopping and purchased makeup,

admissible (Motion in Limine 3).................+ 8 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)... i.e seeeesseeseere

cione v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 800 F.2d 298, 303 (2d Cir. 1986)... ce eeeeeesesseeseeeseeeeeees 13 ill HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011466 --- PAGE BREAK --- Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996) oe ceeeescesseeeseerseeesees 22 Kadant Johnson Inc. v. D’Amico, No. CIV.A. 10-2869, 2

sible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's cl

d Cir. 1986)... ccccccecceeeeees 13 iil HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014791 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 749 Filed 03/17/17 Page 5 of 9 Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996) oo... cece eeeeees 22 Kadant Johnson Inc. v. D'Amico, No. CIV.A. 10-2869, 2012 WL 219