Epstein Secrets

LSD Doc. ., 01/21/2015 Page 20 of 40 between May 2007 and September 2008 on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein by . .. (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." While the Government denied that it had documents reflecting contacts by Prince Andrew,

ement, including efforts on his behalf by Prince Andrew and former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

rew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

by . .. (b) Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/Wa Prince Andrew, Duke of York); (c) Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz." Wh

witz"), a nonparty to this litigation, is the victim of scurrilous allegations made in Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in the Action (the "Joinder Motion"), filed as of record at DE 279. Having no remedy in this proceeding for the harm to his reputational interest, P

llowing: U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10(117 s/ Nicole Simmons 1

stein's Non-Prosecution Agreement in 2007, or in its 2019 indictment of Epstein, which charged Epstein with sex trafficking offenses from 2002-2005. Joinder is improper when the offenses are separated by such a significant time period and do not relate to each other. See Martinez, 1993 WL 322768, at *8-

Terrence Tangney 2015 1 1/7/2013 Armen Brash, Andrew Galivan, Michael J. Davis, Michael Jacoby US-0

Fund X, LP Client 00000424752 Joan ne Jensen 6/10/2016 30 day Temporary Exception for a borrowers resolution which will be issued through this Joinder agreement as stipulated in our procedure manual. Armen Brash 21 Armen Brash, Andrew Galivan, Michael J. Davis, Michael Jacoby US-Onshore 0133347

BREAK --- media outlet in exchange for your statements (whether "on the record" or "off the record") regarding Jeffrey Epstein, Alan M. Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and/or being a sex slave.” Whether Jane Doe No. 3 has interacted with the media has nothing to do with the Florida Defamation Action.

") regarding Jeffrey Epstein, Alan M. Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and/or being a sex slave.” Whether Jane Doe No.

the Court need look no further than Dershowitz’s counterclaim in this case. Count I of Dershowitz’s Counterclaim (styled as “False Allegations in the Joinder Motion”) contends that Edwards and Cassell should pay him damages because they “filed a pleading in the Federal Action titled ‘Jane Doe #3 and Jane D

d to meet Prince Andrew - Epstein trained her ‘as a prostitute for him and his friends’ As the UK's special representative for international trade, the Duke of York holds an important position, requiring sound judgement and widespread respect. + More Videos But those qualities have been thrown into question sin

ut keep those alleged figures anonymous? The bad faith against Prof. Dershowitz is apparent’. ' Similarly, Jane Doe #3’s allegations that she named Prince Andrew because of outstanding 5 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010739 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 6 of

w involved in “lobbying efforts to persuade the Government to give him a more favorable plea arrangement,” and because her allegations against Prince Andrews occurred in London, therefore “affect[ing] foreign commerce” are patently absurd. (DE 291 at 20 and 18, fn. 10.) Because Jane Doe #3’s other allegati

e defense attorneys’. Moreover, because the first time Jane Doe #3 made these contemptible allegations against Prof. Dershowitz was in her Motion for Joinder in December 2014, those allegations are irrelevant as to the inquiry of whether Jane Doe #3’s rights under the CVRA were violated at the time the NPA

Fifth Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10020, By: Andrew G. Celli, Jr., Esq. I This daytime business add

ion (the "Joinder Motion") included numerous details about sexual abuse and listed the perpetrators of her abuse. repeatedly named Maxwell in the Joinder Motion as being personally involved in the sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme created by Epstein. *2 On January 3, 2015, Maxwell again issued