Epstein Secrets

ard one I raised briefly earlier this week — the Home Office doesn't think we're predicated on Nygard, and unless we provide further specifics about Andrew's knowledge of or involvement in criminal conduct in that case, they are not going to process that aspect of the MLAT. I take it from our conversat

oing so? Thx, From: Creffield Philomena Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:15 AM To: M=M 1'; Gibbs Julian ''t ; Browne Margaret ‹ > Cc: Chadwick, Amanda J (London) Subject: RE: Material Witness PA Thanks MI I appreciate you setting out the position regarding the merits of continuing down the non MIA

ou is the one I raised briefly earlier this week — the Home Office doesn't think we're predicated on and unless we provide further specifics about Andrew's knowledge of or involvement in criminal conduct in that case, they are not going to process that aspect of the MLAT. I take it from our conversat

hat you are doing so? Thx, From: Creffield Philomena Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:15 AM To: I Gibbs Julian Browne Margaret Cc: Chadwick, Amanda J (London) Subject: RE: Material Witness PA Thanks I appreciate you setting out the position regarding the merits of continuing down the non MIA rou

ou is the one I raised briefly earlier this week — the Home Office doesn't think we're predicated on and unless we provide further specifics about Andrew's knowledge of or involvement in criminal conduct in that case, they are not going to process that aspect of the MLAT. I take it from our conversat

so? Thx, From: Creffield Philomena Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:15 AM To: Margaret >; Gibbs Julian ; Browne EFTA00102363 Cc: Chadwick, Amanda J (London) Subject: RE: Material Witness PA Thanks I appreciate you setting out the position regarding the merits of continuing down the non MIA rout