Epstein Secrets

no such offer had ever been made. 38. EDWARDS' office also notified Defendant that he intended to take the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) Alan Dershowitz (noted Harvard Law professor, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal

depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) A

ake the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul);

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

d; no such offer had 4 -be made. 38. EDWARDS' office also notified Defendant that he intended to take the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) Alan Dershowiti (noted Harvard Law professor, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal

depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) A

ake the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul);

ut merit and frivoh • 17. Tha, presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these + funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not subje

no such offer had ever been made. 38. EDWARDS' office also notified Defendant that he intended to take the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) Alan Dershowitz (noted Harvard Law professor, constitutional attorney . • and one of EPSTEIN'S crim

depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul); (ii) A

ake the depositions of and was subpoenaing: (i) Donald Trump (real-estate magnate and business mogul);

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not