Epstein Secrets

ition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had

osing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers

at page 283; line 18-20. Q: Mr. Edwards, were you involved in the discussions regarding the deposing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers in your firm including Scott Rothstein? Id. at page 283; line 21-25. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection,

e instruction. Id. at page 286; line 18-19. Q: Isn't it true, Mr. Edwards, that in taking the deposition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had any knowledge of any female having; that is, underage female ever having been on Mr. Epstein's plane and

put you in a position where you would not have been able to, nor would you have proceeded with questions today. Id. at page 100; lines 20-23. MR. HADDAD: We wouldn't even — no, as long as it's pending before the Court, I saw no purpose in having to reestablish that you were objecting. Id. at page 100

at page 283; line 18-20. Q: Mr. Edwards, were you involved in the discussions regarding the deposing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers in your firm including Scott Rothstein? Id. at page 283; line 21-25. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection,

e instruction. Id. at page 286; line 18-19. Q: Isn't it true, Mr. Edwards, that in taking the deposition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had any knowledge of any female having; that is, underage female ever having been on Mr. Epstein's plane and

ition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had

osing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers

put you in a position where you would not have been able to, nor would you have proceeded with questions today. Id. at page 100; lines 20-23. MR. HADDAD: We wouldn't even — no, as long as it's pending before the Court, I saw no purpose in having to reestablish that you were objecting. Id. at page 100

Defendant(s). / PROCEEDINGS HELD BEFORE JUDGE DONALD HAFELE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET CASE FOR TRIAL

ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF(S): SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. By: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT(S): TiN A HADDAD P A By: TONYA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. EFTA00610184 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

r-Plaintiffs. / PROCEEDINGS HELD BEFORE JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Epstein's Motion for Fees and Costs HELD

al amount. I reject it also because of the presence of the Etchaverria case and the other case that involves the law firm that slips my mind. MS. HADDAD: Levin. THE COURT: The Levin case. So there was language principally used in the Wolfe case -- that's the underlying case that you primarily reli

a day. Has anything been filed since we BEFORE: Donald Betel*, Presiding Judge 26 last wore here? I kn

Y EPSTEIN, MR. BREWER: Chester Brewer on behalf Plaintiff, of Jeffrey Epstein. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individbally, BRADLEY SWARDS, individually, MS. HADDAD: Tonya Haddad on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Defendente/Covnter-Plaintlffe. I'm sorry. / 10 THE COURT: That's okay. You have a TRANSCRIPT OF PR