Epstein Secrets

ged. • Professor: Commutation Of Stone's Sentence Confirms Trump's Guilt. • Graham Says He Will Grill Mueller About Russia Investigation. • Former Trump Attorney: Durham Should "Taker A Hard Look" At Weissmann. • Judge Extends Deadline For DO) To Answer Questions About Mueller Report. • Former FBI O

l and Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection Executive Director Joshua A. Geltzer, in an op-ed in The Atlantic (7/14, 3.47M), write, "Donald Trump's commutation of his friend Roger Stone's criminal sentence is one of the most severe affronts to the rule of law during the Trump administration," bu

an op-ed in The Atlantic (7/14, 3.47M), write, "Donald Trump's commutation of his friend Roger Stone's c

ork Times (7/14, 18.61M) reports that on Tuesday, President Trump "rebuffed a question about Black people dying at

ions - lockdowns, masks, extensive testing - that Mr. Trump constantly belittles." In a second related edito

ofessor: Commutation Of Stone's Sentence Confirms Trump's Guilt. • Graham Says He Will Grill Mueller About

.98M), the Chronicle of Higher Education (7/14, Thomason, 74K), the Harvard Crimson (7/14, Caldera, Kurilla, 3K), and the Daily Princetonian (7/14, Shevin, 5K), among other news outlets, also cover the story. Feds Might Apply Discarded Policy To Those Who Haven't Previously Applied For Visas. The Wal

d go without saying that nothing in the Rules can trump a substantive statute passed by Congress. See 28

eking greater restitution); see also id. § 3771(a)(6) (giving victims "the right to full and timely restitution as provided in law"). #24 Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972) (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 (1965)) (emphasis added). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017688 --- PAGE BREA

s can modify substantive rights, °° the CVRA will trump any conflicting provision in the federal rules. °

A. 3771(a)(8) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005). 246 150 Cong. Rec. $10,911 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (emphases added). 247 Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972) (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 (1965)). 248 150 Cong. Rec. $4264 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen