Epstein Secrets

tion. The undisputed facts show the following with regard to each of the persons raised in Epstein's complaint: • Complaint ¶38(i): With regard to Donald Trump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. • Complaint

ach of the persons raised in Epstein's complaint: • Complaint ¶38(i): With regard to Donald Trump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. • Complaint ¶38(ii): With regard to Alan Dershowitz (Harvard Law Pro

s complaint: • Complaint ¶38(i): With regard to Donald Trump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believi

ump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See St

ity and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "evidence of the most persuasive character" from Epstein's repeated

tion (discussed below), he frequently traveled around the globe in the company of such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable to infer that he has international contacts, including international financial contacts. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell

ons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable to infer that

President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. It is therefore reasonable to infer that he ha

t 06/19/2009 Page 10 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON The silence in the face of these questions speaks far louder than words. As Justice Brandeis recognized long ago, "[s]ilence is often evidence of the most persuasive character."' Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 319 (1976) (quoting U.S.

uted facts show the following with regard to each of the persons identified in Epstein's complaint of improper targets of discovery: • With regard to Donald Trump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts filed in support

ns identified in Epstein's complaint of improper targets of discovery: • With regard to Donald Trump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts filed in support of Edwards' Motion for Summary Judgment. • With regard

rump, Edwards had sound legal basis for believing Mr. Trump had relevant and discoverable information. See St

rity and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4" Dist. Ct. App. 1993) (quoting United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149, 153-154 (1923) (Brandeis, J.). In the circumstances of this case, a reasonable finder of fact would have "evidence of the most persuasive character" from Epstein's repeated r