Epstein Secrets

inal investigation into Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. See New York Daily News, "Manhattan Federal Prosecutors Declined to Pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Case in 2016: Sources" (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.nydailynews.com/new-vorkinv- jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- story.

tober 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceedings that you produced on August 13, 2020 and the statements made at the time of arrest,

he government and Mr. Epstein's attorneys concerning the negotiation of the NPA, which you previously produced on August 13, 2020. See, e.g., SDNY GM 00134069 et seq. EFTA00066067 October 13, Page 3 10. We request that the government produce a complete copy of the diary, only seven pages of w

s Attorney's Office w York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on beha

any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil c

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

inal investigation into Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. See New York Daily News, "Manhattan Federal Prosecutors Declined to Pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Case in 2016: Sources" (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.rntdailvnews.com/new-vork/nv- jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzh17zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- storv

tober 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceedings that you produced on August 13, 2020 and the statements made at the time of arrest,

he government and Mr. Epstein's attorneys concerning the negotiation of the NPA, which you previously produced on August 13, 2020. See, e.g., SDNY GM 00134069 et seq. EFTA00084864 October 13, 2020 Page 3 10. We request that the government produce a complete copy of the diary, only seven pages

s Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue

any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil c

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

tes Attorney's Office York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on beha

any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil c

inal investigation into Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. See New York Daily News, "Manhattan Federal Prosecutors Declined to Pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Case in 2016: Sources" (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.nydailynews.com/new-vork/nv- jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzh17zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- story.

tober 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceedings that you produced on August 13, 2020 and the statements made at the time of arrest,

he government and Mr. Epstein's attorneys concerning the negotiation of the NPA, which you previously produced on August 13, 2020. See, e.g., SDNY GM 00134069 et seq. EFTA00087048 October 13, Page 3 10. We request that the government produce a complete copy of the diary, only seven pages of w

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

inal investigation into Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. See New York Daily News, "Manhattan Federal Prosecutors Declined to Pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Case in 2016: Sources" (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.nvdailvnews.com/new-vork/ny- jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzh17zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- storv.

tober 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceedings that you produced on August 13, 2020 and the statements made at the time of arrest,

he government and Mr. Epstein's attorneys concerning the negotiation of the NPA, which you previously produced on August 13, 2020. See, e.g., SDNY GM 00134069 et seq. EFTA00089611 October 13, 2020 Page 3 10. We request that the government produce a complete copy of the diary, only seven pages

ew York New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on beha

any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil c

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

inal investigation into Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. See New York Daily News, "Manhattan Federal Prosecutors Declined to Pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Case in 2016: Sources" (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.nydailynews.com/new-vork/ny- jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzh17zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- story.

tober 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceedings that you produced on August 13, 2020 and the statements made at the time of arrest,

he government and Mr. Epstein's attorneys concerning the negotiation of the NPA, which you previously produced on August 13, 2020. See, e.g., SDNY GM 00134069 et seq. EFTA00101096 October 13, 2020 Page 3 10. We request that the government produce a complete copy of the diary, only seven pages

s Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue

any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil c

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

inal investigation into Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. See New York Daily News, "Manhattan Federal Prosecutors Declined to Pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell Case in 2016: Sources" (Oct. 13, 2020), https://www.nydailynews.com/new-vork/nv- jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzh17zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- storv.

tober 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceedings that you produced on August 13, 2020 and the statements made at the time of arrest,

he government and Mr. Epstein's attorneys concerning the negotiation of the NPA, which you previously produced on August 13, 2020. See, e.g., SDNY GM 00134069 et seq. EFTA00101104 October 13, 2020 Page 3 10. We request that the government produce a complete copy of the diary, only seven pages

s Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear ..,-:,w.cohenges

any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil c

evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e

n/durartide.asp?NAPC=S&AccessionNo=O800000020110317e73d0003m • The Daily Telegraph, MEDIA Article,United Kingdom,Headline:VVHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE MAXWELLS? After their father's death, the children of the disgraced publisher closed ranks. Peter Stanford asks if that same solidarity will save Ghislaine f

E MAXWELLS? After their father's death, the children of the disgraced publisher closed ranks. Peter Stanford asks if that same solidarity will save Ghislaine from the taint of scandal. http://alobal.factive.cornien/duiartide.asp?NAPC=S&AccessionNo=DT000C0020110312e73c000I1 • Press Association National Ne

amp ROC Sutoatec Agreemat the inicanabon contaned in this document is b alert purposesonly ar4 is not tote used to' mimosasof oeleernntrg an 'NM d ?Agars angibiltrot any met of any Ma FCRA parmatobb papacies Use, further agrees to row soca matenal and intormanco n MtctMt canna/nee net to make tit.a tne

knows points and may be toed at any Rod Door Arca GM oertfoates put wish deparhnont saxes r. istigtt

s. Earn double points from April 10th to May 10th on any red door salon & spa purchase of $150 or more online or in a Red Door Salon. Drou: Sono Agars only walla* at partspalirg Red Door Saco koaSonis end for Oar* troncedbos, not old al any Red Deco Sakes WNW uithin depatwont seen. Paned Dar gai co