Epstein Secrets

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey PagIluca Denver. Colorado www.hmtlaw.com At the initial conference

don, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey PagIluca Denver. Colorado www.hmtlaw.com At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the